] NEWS: Money-go-round Budget fails to deliver - Rt Hon John Key
News release

5 Comments
17 May 2007
NEWS: Money-go-round Budget fails to deliver

Taxpayers are worse off after the minority Labour Government's Budget today failed to deliver tax relief for average Kiwi families facing ever higher mortgage rates and cost of living, says National Party Leader John Key.

"Perhaps the biggest hoax perpetrated in this Budget was on businesses, which on the one hand get tax cuts but on the other are forced to match their employees' Kiwisaver contributions in a cruel money-go-round.

"This is a minority Budget because the majority of New Zealanders want personal tax cuts. Helen Clark and Michael Cullen have failed the credibility test – yet again – and failed to deliver.

"In fact, Aucklanders gets a tax increase through regional petrol taxes. Adding insult to injury, Labour has also axed the paltry 'chewing gum' tax threshold changes due next year.

"Not only that, but workers in Kiwisaver will have to forgo any wage increases for four years while employer compulsory contributions to the scheme progressively rise.

"Labour has failed since 1999 to deliver any return to hard-working Kiwis, nor has it offered any incentives to get ahead under their own steam.

"Instead, Labour has squandered the huge surpluses built up during the golden weather by building up bureaucratic and complex schemes that attach a raft of conditions to every cent given back to Kiwis.

"The inconvenient truth about Labour's economic management has been laid bare in this Budget.

"Helen Clark said in 1999 that Labour would take New Zealand up the OECD ladder – but we have fallen behind the rest of the developed world.

"We compete with places like Portugal and the Czech Republic - not the US or Australia.

"Labour Budgets like this will do little to address that slow decline."


Trackbacks

VIDEO: Journal #9 - On Budget 2007
In this eighth edition of his video journal series, John has just come up from the House following the Labour-led Government's release of Budget 2007. In his response to the 'money-go-round' Budget, he said that taxpayers were actu
Weblog: John Key
Tracked: May 17, 17:22

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Karen 2007-05-18 14:57 - (Reply)

On reading Key Notes No 10 I wanted to make a short reply on the Kiwisaver comments in regards to its effect on ‘low to middle income’ earners. I would rate myself in the group low to middle income earner. I am a home owner and a single parent of two children who are dependant on me. I work part-time hours so as to be available to my children after school (child care for under 14’s is very expensive), for both financial and personal reasons I choose to work a 30hr week so my family have the availability of their one parent when they need. I qualify for Working for Families Tax Credits and also for an Accommodation Allowance from Work and Income. One of my children also qualifies for a disability allowance for medical reasons. I would in no way consider myself ‘well off’ financially and have to be careful with my finances. Therefore I consider myself to be one of the people you say would most likely be unable to afford Kiwisaver. However I believe through my own experiences (from being on the DPB to working in different jobs over the past 4 years to provide for my family) that everyone can afford Kiwisaver at a 4% savings rate. They may choose to spend their 4% in some other way than saving, but I do believe with some re-looking at ones budget and making choices that are financially wise the average ‘low to middle’ income earner can take part in this scheme. I most certainly already save more per week than 4% and if I choose to start up a Kiwisaver scheme I would have no problem making my weekly contribution, and therefore benefiting from both my employers matched contribution and the governments $20 per week. (Which is my tax money, coming back in part to me). I believe that Working for Families and other financial help available to the low income earner DOES offer opportunity for New Zealanders to get ahead. Without these opportunities provided I most certainly would be in a lesser financial position and struggling to move forward. I would then be unable to take part in such schemes as Kiwisaver offers. This has totally been made possible by the system the government currently offers, I have had no financial windfalls, no inheritances, no other help but what is on offer and I believe I have used it wisely thus far. I am positive about my future and my retirement options. I will have enough to support my lifestyle above and beyond any pension on offer when that time comes. The system is working for low income earners if they make it work for themselves.

#2 - CG 2007-05-18 15:07 - (Reply)

A little less rhetoric on what Labour has done with the budget!!PLEASE A BIT MORE ON WHAT NATIONAL CAN DO FOR NEW ZEALANDERS IF THEY GET ELLECTED!!

#3 - Don Donovan 2007-05-18 16:08 - (Reply)

They say that an 'average' couple who join Kiwisaver today will collect $400 000.00 in 35 years' time. I wonder what four hundred grand will buy then? We paid $24500.00 for our house and grounds in 1972, it's Govt.Valued at just under a million 35 years later! That's inflation for yer!

#4 - Tony J Walker 2007-05-18 21:05 - (Reply)

as a person caught out in the compulsory superannuation scheme of the 70's will you do what mr muldoon did when he came into power i.e take it of us and spend the money that we had put into the scheme. will you do this to the kiwisaver when you comeback into power. also as a small business owner i would like to hear more of what national is going to do to help us out instead of this blaming each other in the house , because the last time your party was in i was worse off, especially with regards to acc etc

#5 - Les Mckavanagh 2007-05-19 17:23 - (Reply)

abolish savings tax will go a long way to fixing the saving problem


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.