] SPEECH: Fighting for Tomorrow - Rt Hon John Key
Speech

22 Comments
05 August 2007
SPEECH: Fighting for Tomorrow

Let me start by saying to all of you – thank-you.

National would not exist without you. Thank you for all the work you have done to get us to where we are today. And thank you, in advance, for the work you are going to do as we run up to the election.

I want to single out two people in particular. The first is our party president, Judy Kirk. Judy is a tireless president. She is 120% dedicated to the National Party.

The other person I want to single out is Bill English. Bill is the wise old head of our caucus – even if he is four months younger than me.

I want to ask you a question. Why have we given up our weekend to gather here in Auckland?

I'll give you one reason. We're sick of Labour telling us what to do. We're sick of being told how to bring up our kids, what to put in school lunchboxes, and that we have to microchip our dogs. We're sick of being told off for buying houses and for eating pies.

But it's more than that.

We are also here because we believe in the principles of the National Party. We believe in individual freedom and individual responsibility. We believe the government should underpin our society but not dominate it. We believe in the importance of families and of home ownership. We believe in an open and competitive economy. We believe in tolerance and respect for all New Zealanders.

In my opinion, the National Party has been at its very best when it has used its heart as well as its brain. Today I want assure you that I will lead a government for all New Zealanders.

National's policies

This year I have announced some major pieces of policy.

Following my Burnside speech in January, I have made a number of policy announcements aimed at turbo-charging the efforts of community and voluntary groups.

I announced there would be unlimited tax breaks for volunteers and for charitable donations. I announced there would be significant changes in the way National would contract with community groups.

Our policy of removing the cap from charitable donations was very well received. In fact, it was so well received that Labour stole it word for word and announced it in this year's Budget.

But I know we will never break the cycles of disadvantage unless we give young people the skills they need. That's one reason I have a strong focus on education.

Another reason is this – I know from personal experience that education is a liberator. Unless we ensure that every Kiwi is equipped with a decent education, we are robbing them of a future.

As a starting point, I have announced that National will require all primary schools to test children against national standards in reading, writing and maths, and to report these results to parents.

I will not stand back as Prime Minister of New Zealand and let 1 in 5 kids leave school without anywhere near the level of literacy and numeracy they need to succeed.

And while we're at it we're going to bring hands-on trades and apprenticeship training back, where it belongs, in the heart of our school system. Let's make school relevant and interesting for all young New Zealanders.

This year I've also had a lot to say about the environment. I have made it clear that National takes the issue of climate change very seriously.

So, after careful deliberation, we announced our target of cutting New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by the year 2050. This target strikes the proper balance between our economic opportunities and our environmental responsibilities.

It is the right thing to do. Unlike Helen Clark, I'm not going to make extravagant promises about carbon emissions that will send people to the dole queue.

Let me assure you that we are going to unfold a lot more policy over the next year, leading up to the 2008 election.

In that election, Kiwis will be voting for the sort of future they want.

The economy

I have some good news and bad news about the future. Let's start with the good news.

The prospects for New Zealand are better than they have been in decades.

We face a golden opportunity to become a more prosperous country. Demand is booming for the commodities we produce, especially dairy products. The world wants to buy protein and we are one of its biggest exporters. Countries are willing to pay good money for the food we produce, and we have a natural advantage in producing it.

What is more, some of those countries – particularly China and India – are getting wealthier all the time. They have a growing middle class, which more and more will want to buy high-quality foods. They want to travel. They want to educate their children. They will want safe places to locate their businesses.

They will look to New Zealand for these things. And they will do this on a scale which is almost unimaginable.

We are in the midst of incredibly powerful global trends which are going to sweep us along whether we like it or not. The question isn't whether those trends will happen. The question is whether we can take the most advantage of them.

We don't need 1970s vision, we need 2020 vision.

That's where I come to the bad news. The bad news is that right now there is a huge risk that we will miss the boat.

Our economy is seriously underpowered. Our productivity is declining. Because of this, our economy can't grow at more than a very modest rate without causing inflation, high interest rates, and an over-valued exchange rate. We're seeing this very clearly right now. Floating mortgage rates are over 10% and the exchange rate is just off record highs.

I think of it like getting on an 80cc motorbike and trying to go 100 kilometres an hour. It's possible, but only if you rev the hell out of it. And if you do that, the engine will eventually pack in.

As a country we can't sustain that. Someone has to pay the price. Make no mistake: New Zealanders are paying the price for our underpowered economy. Homeowners, businesses, and exporters are being crippled by interest rates and the dollar.

The other result of an underpowered economy is that the rest of the world is pulling away from us. Our little 80cc economy isn't powerful enough to compete with more productive countries.

Of the 30 countries in the OECD, New Zealand is now ranked No 22 in terms of national income per person. We have managed to fall behind every single country in Western Europe with one exception, and that's Portugal. The countries we can now compare ourselves with are those in Eastern Europe, like the Czech Republic and Hungary.

So there are real issues with the fundamentals of our economy. You know what those issues are:

  • We have an infrastructure deficit throughout the country.
  • 1 in 5 Kiwi kids leave school unable to read, write and do maths at the minimum expected level.
  • Skilled people are deserting the country in droves. Each week 760 people leave New Zealand to live in Australia.
  • New Zealanders are completely frustrated by the bureaucracy and over-regulation that hampers anything they try to do.

This Government shows no signs of being willing or able to deal with these issues. As Bill English talked about yesterday, Labour's main focus for the rest of this term is getting its Electoral Finance Bill passed so it can silence its critics in election year.

If ever there was a sign of a desperate, distracted, and dying government, surely this is it.

Our country is simply not living up to its potential.

We desperately need to grow our productive capacity. We can't just keep on pushing our existing capacity to the max. We need an engine that's bigger than 80cc. Then we could have good growth in our economy without pushing interest rates and the exchange rate sky high.

National has a plan for growing New Zealand's engine. Bill talked about this yesterday. We know what it takes.

It starts with progressively cutting personal taxes, and that will begin in Bill's very first Budget.

We will take a disciplined approach to government spending. You work too hard for us to waste your money.

We will stop the massive rise in head office bureaucracy that Labour has encouraged.

We will deal with the regulatory and compliance cost issues which smother New Zealand businesses.

We will invest in the infrastructure this country desperately needs to grow.

We will have an unwavering focus on education.

And, yes, as Nick Smith told Conference yesterday, we will reform the Resource Management Act.

Families

I unashamedly want New Zealand to be a more prosperous country.

I want us to foot it with the most privileged countries in the world. I want our families to have a pay packet each week that ensures them genuine choices in their lives. I want Kiwi families to have a feeling of security, and not to be living from one week to the next. I want our children and our grandchildren to be able to chase their dreams here in New Zealand, not for their dream to be leaving New Zealand.

Families are tremendously important. I think most New Zealanders would agree that the security, happiness and welfare of their family are the most precious things to them in the world. Perhaps that is why most of us can scarcely believe the horrific cases of child abuse that are becoming a regular feature of our news bulletins.

I was sickened to the very pit of my stomach by reports of the barbaric abuse that cost the life of three-year-old Nia Glassie.

In my first major speech as leader, at Burnside, I talked about there being an underclass in New Zealand. If anyone was wondering if this underclass really existed, then surely the circumstances of Nia Glassie's horrific death has erased all doubt.

Every five weeks in New Zealand a child dies at the hands of their parent or caregiver. As a society, and as a government, we must be single-minded in our intolerance of such behaviour.

These are the individual acts of individual New Zealanders. It doesn't matter what excuses are dreamed up for child abusers, there's no getting away from the fact that they are personally responsible for their actions.

We don't need to hear excuses for violence, we need it to stop. I want to send a very clear message: Under a government I lead, child abusers will be severely punished.

As Simon told Conference yesterday, National is committed to making changes to the Sentencing Act that reflect the way we think society should deal with these people.

Families are, in my view, the greatest institution in our society, however they are made up. A government I lead will support them.

But supporting parents, most of whom do a good job of raising their children, does not mean meddling in their lives or telling them what to do all the time. I believe in the power of people to effect a real change in their family's circumstances, if they are given the space and the encouragement to do so.

So I want to talk about two aspects of government support for families.

The first is Working for Families. There are a number of aspects of Working for Families I don't like.

I don't like the fact that it makes families face high effective tax rates and therefore penalises them if they want to better themselves. I don't like the way it reaches into relatively high income brackets. I don't like the way it subjects many taxpayers to the indignity of claiming their own money back in government payments.

Hard-working New Zealand families deserve a break, but we do best by giving them a break through cutting their taxes.

I know it is tough out there for people with kids, who are working long hours and trying to get by on a modest wage. In the absence of any tax cuts, families have been forced to rely on Working for Families payments to keep their heads above water.

So today I want to give New Zealand families some reassurance. National will address the issues of high effective tax rates under Working for Families. We will also take higher income families out of the Working for Families loop. But we will make these changes in conjunction with significant personal tax cuts.

A government I lead will take from taxpayers only what it needs. It won't take more than it needs, return it to you via the welfare system, and expect you to be grateful for the privilege.

The bottom line is that families will be better off financially under National. We are going to give New Zealanders the chance to get ahead under their own steam because that's what New Zealanders want and that's what they deserve.

Home ownership

The second issue relating to families I want to talk about is home ownership.

When you buy a house for the first time you are doing so much more than just shaking off your landlord. You are taking a long-term stake in a neighbourhood, and in the local community. You are buying a place where family occasions will be celebrated and memories made for as long as you want to live there.

Because you will be paying rates and a mortgage for the first time, you might start taking more interest in your local council, and in the New Zealand economy.

So buying a house is a vote of confidence in your own future and in New Zealand's future.

But the Kiwi dream of home ownership is under threat. Fewer New Zealanders own their own home than ever before. Some choose not to buy a house, but many more simply can't afford to buy one.

International surveys rank New Zealand as having the second worst housing affordability problem in the world. Auckland is one of the 25 least affordable cities on the planet. But it's not just a problem in Auckland. You can buy a condo on the Miami waterfront for less than the price of the latest beachfront apartment on the Kapiti Coast.

Even if you can afford a deposit on a home, you'll face higher mortgage interest rates in New Zealand than almost anywhere else in the developed world.

Young people who are working hard, and who are trying hard to save, don't know whether they will ever be able to afford their own home.

Frankly, I thought it was a bit rich of Helen Clark to say last weekend that Labour was concerned about housing affordability. Her Government has spent eight years over-taxing New Zealanders and letting interest rates go through the roof.

Tonight, Helen Clark should look in the bathroom mirror and ask: "What have I done for housing affordability in the past eight years?" She'll have answered before she's squeezed out the toothpaste. Nothing.

The truth is that when it comes to housing affordability, this Government is the problem, not the solution. It is the Government's economic management and its heavy-handed regulation that has made owning your own home unattainable for many people.

Onerous rules and requirements have made land more expensive and building on that land more expensive. Meanwhile, we're running out of people who are able to build houses in the first place. As a result of all this, there are not enough houses being built to replace the old ones and to keep up with population growth.

But I want to assure our young people that they needn't despair. A National Government will actively preserve and promote the home-ownership aspirations of everyday New Zealanders. We are a party founded on the principle of home ownership and we intend to deliver on that principle.

Back in 1936, when Labour was concerned with nationalising the means of production and advancing socialism, the National Party was concerned with home ownership and standing up for wealth creation through a property-owning democracy.

Unlike Labour, this issue is not new for our party. Mind you, it is true that Labour has been talking more about housing in recent times. The difference is that Michael Cullen has yet again been looking for new ways to tax it.

Unlike Labour, National has a concrete plan for making housing more affordable. It has four parts to it:

  • Ensuring people are in a better financial position to afford a house.
  • Freeing up the supply of land.
  • Dealing with the compliance issues that drive up building costs, and
  • Allowing state house tenants to buy the houses they live in.

I want to talk about these points in a little more detail.

No 1. We will make sure people can better afford to purchase and pay their mortgage on a home. We will lower personal income taxes, which will ease the burden of mortgage repayments, and will also help people who are saving for a house deposit.

We will also keep interest rates down by growing the productivity of the New Zealand economy. That will make a huge difference to people's ability to service a mortgage.

No 2. We will take the legislative actions required to ensure there is an increased supply of suitable land available to build houses on. Difficulties with the Resource Management Act, and disagreements between various arms of local government, too often slow the release of land. This drives up its price and the cost of its development.

Any changes we make to streamline and speed up the process of zoning or land release will require developers to build on that land within a reasonable timeframe. This will prevent the land-banking that is currently choking off the supply of land.

No 3. A high legislative priority for National will be amending the Building Act to pull back the red tape and instead drive quality through greater commercial accountability.

Labour's new Building Act has added enormous costs and delays for builders and councils. Development and building levies have tripled under Labour. Quite simply, these costs are making houses unnecessarily expensive for the average Kiwi family.

No 4. We will allow Housing New Zealand tenants who want to purchase the house they live in, to do so. Under National, they can own the place they call home. We will reinvest the proceeds straight back into replacement houses for those desperately needy families on the waiting list.

It's a win-win for everyone. The state housing stock is maintained, some families get to experience home ownership for the first time, and the most vulnerable in our communities get to move off the waiting list into affordable housing.

Alongside this four-point plan, National is also going to increase trades-training opportunities so New Zealand has more skilled people to build and develop new houses. This will start with our trades-in-schools programme, and will include boosting apprenticeship training. New Zealand has faced a critical shortage of builders, plumbers and electricians for far too long.

I can assure you that there is a whole lot more policy development to come in this area. We've been a party of home ownership since our inception in1936 and that's where we'll stay.

Under National, every young New Zealander should know that if they work hard and are disciplined about saving, they can expect to buy their own home.

Conclusion

Delegates. It is said in politics that governments get voted out, oppositions don't get voted in. Maybe that in itself is a good enough reason to toss this Government out.

But surely if the only reason we are elected in 2008 is because Labour has come to the end of its run, we will have failed ourselves. Our party has much more to offer than that. New Zealanders deserve more than that.

Our people deserve a vision for this country – a vision that's about them, not what's best for the Labour Party.

So let me say this. My vision is that when our children and our grandchildren are deciding where to make their life, they choose New Zealand; that in a global world where they are free to call almost any country home, they choose New Zealand.

And they do it because they can see a positive future where they will be paid what they are worth.

And they do it because we're a country that's growing in confidence.

And they do it because we're a country where people are safe and where we can see out our final years in dignity.

And they do it because we're a country that respects and cares for the land we live on.

And we care about our communities.

And fundamentally we care about one another.

So when you leave here today, and as you prepare for next year's election, never forget what you are fighting for. You are fighting for tomorrow. For the chance to shape tomorrow. For the chance to make a difference and to leave behind a better New Zealand

Because it's time. It's time for confidence. It's time for optimism. It's time for a National Government. It's our time.

That's what we are fighting for and it can't come soon enough.


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - margaret hawthorn 2007-08-06 11:13 - (Reply)

I am all in favour of helping the young people who wish to purchase their own homes, I had help with mine when I was younger, and very much appreciate that. I am now widowed and have a freehold home for which I am very thankful. I am coming up for retirement and I feel that I am in for a bleak hard time, I have just over 4 years before I reach 65 and it frightens me, I would like to go into retirement with all my debts paid, and perhaps a little cushion for emergencies, but I honestly feel that this is going to be harder as my standard of living slips and I have to work harder for my money which seems to do nothing, my rates are going up, my power bill is difficult to meet, but I hate to be cold. Can you give me any hope in your new government ( because logically you must win, we can't go on with a labour govt.) Can I look forward to a happy retirement, or a lifestyle of scrimping and going to bed early to stay wam??

#1.1 - Michelle Matthews 2007-08-06 16:17 - (Reply)

Isn't it great that we can finally get excited about the National Party again, the marriage of John Keys and Bill English is what this country needs, their key issues of housing, tax breaks and deregulating our land issues is so good to hear. With the parliamentary experience of English and Keys dynamic approach to life and politics. Every kiwi deserves to have the choice of whether to own their own home whether it be a state house or not, under this present Labour government that choice is taken away because our young people cannot afford it. I say, bring on the election.

#2 - Tim Jamindar-Arnold 2007-08-07 11:16 - (Reply)

It is such a pleasure to read words of a Political Leader with real Vision! Up until now there has only been one political party leader who I could see who had clearly defined common sense principles with which they would lead. I now currently feel there are three but of course most notable is John Key. Here is a man and a party that I can put my absolute faith in to take this country forward economically and socially. I look forward to living a prosperous life under a national lead MMP government with two or three coalition partners at their side.

#3 - Chris Johnson 2007-08-07 22:00 - (Reply)

Hi John, Nice speech. I have a rule of thumb for any personal or business project under this Labour Government of New Zealand. " Work out how much you want to spend maximum. Add 50% and that will be the price minimum" It doesn't matter how well researched you are, it is impossible to foresee the cost of compliance from every angle. It is this risk that makes me very nervous about any venture. That is why we have no productive engine for New Zealand. Kiwis are very smart and do their SWOT well ( Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. )Though as you say the opportunities are right up there, unfortunately the threats are too great to take the plunge right now for many. Hey I cannot even get my workers to run up any overtime as they think they will lose their percieved free paycheck from working for families. Why work overtime for an overall lower net hourly rate. Hard to argue. They are encouraged and rewarded by Labour as a workforce to chissle. This is not the natural personality of my team or any kiwi team.It is a shame to see. So you are right, we are missing the opportunity. Never the less, my Wife Nina and I along with our two kids have decided to apply my rule of thumb, and build the 10 acre dream because we see it as our last ever opportunity. We have decided that we will not be beaten and will instead come out the other side all the better. My Key, We are relying on you to lead the next government. Otherwise we might have bitten off a whole lot more than we can chew. No Pressure. Regards, Chris Johnson

#4 - Steve Southall 2007-08-10 15:46 - (Reply)

Hi John I applaud the general thrust of your speech, but I'm a bit concerned with your Home Ownership bullet "Freeing up the supply of land". Auckland is already a huge city geographically. Surely we don't want to encroach further on prime dairying and horticultural land to build more houses on quarter acre sections, and have people commute for hours into the city at a time petrol prices are set to rise dramatically. I believe it makes much more sense to increase the density of the housing we already have, particularly along existing public transport corridors. So long as the housing and associated infrastructure are properly designed (ie don't turn in to slums), this would be a much better way to solve the housing crisis. How about an initiative to remove the red tape associated with urban renewal? Cheers Steve

#5 - Lindsay Andrews said:
2007-08-10 17:14 - (Reply)

I'm in favour of most of your housing initiatives. However, even though I have been a property speculator, I do believe that there should be a capital gains tax on all properties apart from the family home, and also the tax advantage on purchasing additional properties should be removed by ring-fencing losses from investments in rental property. From the conversations I have had with a wide variety of people I am sure these initiatives would be vote winners. However, I realise they would not have a hope in hell of getting support as they would adversly affect too many members of the house.

#6 - ed van son 2007-08-10 17:47 - (Reply)

hi well i think you have good intentions. but i see the problem being your direction will end in war. your direction will always end in war. land ownership is theft. of course national party politics is based on this from 1936. it is based on english, european imperial values where land ownership is king. supported through violence of its military support. sadly there is not enough land for everyone if someone owns large chucks of it. in fact it is feasible-tho unlikely-someone could own all of new zealand one day. who will prevent this? in fact it could happen anywhere, as money is king and we live in a plutocracy. what then? war. personally, i dont like war. is this an extreme viewpoint? killing to protect family members doesnt seem to resonate with your premise of families being important. maybe im exaggerating. maybe only 1,000 people will control the bulk of nzs land in 2100. anyway people should be able to do what they want to do. to learn what they enjoy and to work satisfyingly on projects they feel they can contribute to. i agree your way is the only way forward for nz. but for the world? if we keep going this way.. who knows.. labour is struggling but i think your dreams are utopian and will require even harder work when really what is the purpose of life john? to enjoy oneself or to work harder and harder each year when technology should really be easing our lives globally. and we need to take ecological action NOW. its ridiculous to wait till 2050!! what if its too late then? there really needs to be world action. can you not spur for global change? we all live in this world. the pollutants are there because of our constant drive for better faster. we all know that driving 100kmh on an 80cc scooter uses way more petrol than driving slower and who-in this day and age-is saying bigger engines are better????? yours ed

#6.1 - Kelly 2008-01-22 15:58 - (Reply)

The Treaty of Waitangi isn't a ticket for revervse physco or whatever physcology you use to burn your own bridges. Colonalism evolved and saved many kiwis existence. But today it's the radicalism that ruins life for everyone. The radicals refuse to apprentiate how colonalism stopped tribal warfare, cannonbalism etc. So be careful with your false accusations and stop burning your own poeples bridges. The National Party aren't your enemy, you are your own worst enemy. The Treaty of Waitangi isn't a grevience day, isn't it a Government organised holiday to celebrate your culture. If evolution hasn't paid for the treaty, is the extra specail treaty unapprecited. National try to not offend the Moari culture in the most gentlemen way, and diffinately have never tried to take the Moari out Moari as many have learned. Master Grasshoper

#7 - Wal Gordon 2007-08-11 04:38 - (Reply)

If you want to help with keeping costs down for home owners you may want to get on the band wagon and put a stop to the Plumbers Gas Fitters and Drainlayers Board and Ministry of Heaith implementing Competency Based Licencing for the Plumbing and Drainlaying Trade. The cost to the industry is about 120,000 unproductive hours per year for the trade and about $18,000,000.00 in real costs which the trade will have to pass on to the consumer. The implementation of the Competency Based Licencing will create a shortage of plumbers and will put even greater strain on an already stretched trade. I employ four apprentices and will look seriously at not taking any more on due to the Licencing Compliance costs, about $3,000.00 per man. If the public knew they were up for a $18,000,000.00 licencing cost and a greater shortage of plumbers I'm sure they wouldn't be happy with Labour. Have someone contact me and I can go figures. Keep up the good work.

#8 - Judi Mackinnon 2007-08-11 16:54 - (Reply)

Great speech. Please dont revert to making personal attacks on members of the opposition as it looks petty. I absolutely endorse the education update as it is the key to a lot of young people falling through the cracks as they have no confidence or self esteem. If school is the only place they can recieve this then thats where it will have to be taught,Lower tax rates please, My son worked two part time jobs to put himself through courses to further his education . Now that he is in a well paid job he pays high tax to support the Dont want to work, cant work , etc . He is married with a wife and two children, give him some reward for the years of struggle that he had had.Cheers good luck judi

#9 - Murray Hastie 2007-08-12 11:56 - (Reply)

Good morning John I have read with interest the comments by Tony Ryal re our health system. I am not going to comment on the hospital system - plenty of other can do that. My concern is with the recently set up PHO system for primary health care. I have spent several years on the board of one organisation, and as Chairman if a Community Advisory Group. I have now resigned from both the positions I formerly held - in sheer frustration and disbelief at the huge new level of administration that has been set up. It beggars belief that so much money can be poured in to this section of the health system for so little gain. The waste is enormous. Yet, sadly, most of the people consider it OK. It is as clear as can be that the professionals in this system have no regard for the concerns of clients. It is all about power and control. I will not be part of that culture, and have walked away in disgust. Unfortunately, this does not achieve anything for the patiets in our communities, especially our rural communities which is where my focus is. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss my concerns if anyone is interested. Millions taxpayer dollars are being squandered and if this expenditure could be re-routed in to patient care, we may start to get somewhere. Keep the good work going.

#9.1 - Nathan McCluskey 2007-08-13 09:41 - (Reply)

While I agree that there is waste in the health system and there are a number of ways these excesses could be diminished, the health system in New Zealand compared to other countries I have lived in is commendable in most respects. I get free health care for my children, cheap care with a community services card or student ID, my father was recently hospitalised twice in the public system and was dealt with very quickly and effectively. To me, these are indications of a system running well. At least, it's working well in my experience. However, I am told that there is over-expenditure in administration, for health professionals, drugs and that people are being kicked off waiting lists. However, me, my family and my friends don't seem to have been negatively affected by these. I had a close friend who died waiting for a heart operation in the 1990s, but that was during the previous National Government's tenure. My father needed a similar operation and he received treatment without delay. My wife and I invested in private health insurance recently because we fear National will win the next election and return to the user-pays policy environment of the 1990s and we don't want to be caught wanting. But in respect to the operation of New Zealand's health system currently, I would use Murray's words - keep the good work going.

#10 - Stephen Helm 2007-08-16 16:00 - (Reply)

Affordable Housing. Yes sell some Govt housing stock but put money into building more rentals at alower cost so the scheme keeps going into the future.

#10.1 - Tim 2007-09-05 00:38 - (Reply)

I'm a 30 year old highly qualified New Zealander living in Australia. I would love to return to New Zealand but the cost of housing relative to income really puts me off. I thought Australian house prices were bad enough but I notice Auckland, Tauranga and Wellington houses are all now more expensive than Melbourne. Plus you earn more here, the interest rates are lower and the quality of housing is better. Why on earth has New Zealand turned real-estate into a market targeted at investors? 1 in 6 New Zealanders now have an investment property. Houses should be for living in not for speculating on. Investors should be persuaded to put their money in to more productive investments i.e. NZ businesses to help grow the economy and exports. I earn a good income but with a young family would struggle to afford the repayments on the average house in any major New Zealand city. If I would struggle then low to middle income earners must be completely priced out. It is horrible to not be able to afford your own home to raise a family in. What has happened to New Zealand if this basic ideal is now out of reach for young families? I am bitter towards property investors that have profited off all this speculation in real-estate, made a fortune and in doing so priced out young families. There is two solutions to this problem in New Zealand: 1) Increase the supply of cheap land (remove restrictions, taxes and charges) 2) Decrease Demand (Capital Gains Tax, block foreign ownership) Anything else, such as Labours ridiculous shared equity scheme, does not address the problem. In fact Labours proposal will just increase demand and make house prices worse. Unfortunately for some to fix the problem prices must come down. If New Zealand cares at all for their young people they will do something. Otherwise young New Zealand families might as well leave. Move to Houston where incomes are higher and $200k will get you this: http://search.har.com/engine/dispSearch.cfm?mlnum=5457083&class=1&leadid=6&sTYPE=0&backButton=Y

#11 - Rhea Dasent 2007-09-05 11:01 - (Reply)

I agree with Steve Southall on the supply of land. Many towns and cities in NZ have developed as a market place close to agricultural and horticultural farms, and for conveniance have been built on nice flat flood plains. As a result, urban sprawl of these towns and cities are encroaching on good productive soils. Farm prices have been increasing exponentially due to "subdivision potential" of land, not productivity. I don't think that freeing up the supply of land is going to solve housing affordability issues, but rather densification and cutting down compliance costs is a better idea. I think National Policy of reworking the RMA is a good one. RMA complaince issues can stifle farmers ideas for expanding business to support their families and grow food for the rest of us. There are also RMA problems with public amenity being valued over financial viability of farming to earn a living eroding private property rights.

#12 - Paul Brydon 2007-09-06 20:29 - (Reply)

Being a hospital doctor, I get to see some disgusting acts of cruelty towards children. I totally support any policies which harshen penalties for violent crime, especially against children. Child homocide always seems to be preceded by systematic torture making it even more sickening. I don't believe for a second that sending money and do-gooders into dysfuntional and sociopathic households is the answer. People that can comit such acts have to be removed, imprisoned, or worse, fullstop. Proper sentences and no right to a benefit once you have a criminal record would be a start?

#13 - Luke Bailey 2007-09-07 11:48 - (Reply)

I think another probem that New Zealand faces in the near future is voter apathy.An apathetic electorate that doesn't care about politics is a greater danger to democracy than *any* form of totalitarianism. In the last 20 years, national voter turnout in parliamentary elections has declined to 80 percent from nearly 95, and local body turnout down to a paltry 40 odd percent.An the trend looks only to be accelerating. 18 year olds are coming out of school completely ignorant of how the electoral system works and the major players in determing our nations future.And why?? because the sum total of political education in New Zealand schools is nil.Absolutely *nothing* Research has proven that voting is a habitual activity.If a young person does not vote in their first election, then chances are, they will never vote throught their life.One would think that it is a responsibility of the education system to educate people on how to be productive members of society- that is to think critically and outside of the square. Regardless of election results something must be done

#14 - Tim Corbett 2007-09-18 07:35 - (Reply)

Thank you John, it can not come soon enough. Please be real. For too long we have suffered from posturing politics, lies and waste. New Zealand doesn't have any time left for this to continue. I like what you say, it mirrors what I believe NZ should be, and what it was when I was growing up. You need to hit the deck fast and running, making the right changes so quick this countries head will spin. Sound Business decisions tempered with old fashioned sense. Please tighten up the immigration/refugee laws - this is a dangerous area for NZ. Take a leaf out of the Aussies stance. Working Kiwis are too busy to hold our goverments hand, we need you acting in our best interests. Helen Clark - Get out of the chair!!!

#15 - Tim Corbett 2007-09-18 19:41 - (Reply)

John - remember to honor the Kiwi's, we do not want nuclear power, we do not want to go to war. This is Middle Earth. The majority rules - do not, except in extreme situations push through policies that Kiwi's don't want. That isn't governance, it's dishonest. Remember you are presenting this vision to New Zealand from your heart, that is the truth and the value.

#16 - Chris Leamy 2007-11-05 14:59 - (Reply)

Some of us remember what Jim Boldger,Jenny Shipley and Ruth Richarson did to working people's rights and their pathetic minimum wage. I notice John Keys never seems to condemn this, would he go down this road again ?

#17 - Kelly 2008-01-16 12:59 - (Reply)

MMP is the regulation of Freedon of speech I agree with many people that MMP should be 3% of the vote to get a seat. Freedom of speech should be made easier to hear through democratic proceedings or MMP anyway, especially in a small democrary!. Thats what freedom of speech through MMP is about. And it is hard to stare freedom of speech away from democratic proceedings. But how can you drop MMP to 3% without mathematically upsetting parliments 120 seats. Or maybe it's possible to take the MMP votes off Labour and the National Party to help smaller parties make the threshold. To debate their causes through MMP? What does the National Party think? Can MMP be lowered to 3% by taking MMP off the first two parties past the posts. Does the National Party see the republican idealogy as a Labour idea because they don't want o been seen as incumbant? Anyhow finally MMP produces a real Government. The PC 'phrase' will finally be polically correct because the majority far outways minority reports. All the the ex-protesters and no brainers will get voted out of parliment. Kelly

#18 - real estate said:
2010-05-17 15:55 - (Reply)

Every one has equal rights in a country. We must fight for that.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.