] NEWSLETTER: Key Notes No.18 - Rt Hon John Key
Newsletter

15 Comments
07 September 2007
NEWSLETTER: Key Notes No.18

Better Care for the Elderly

Our population is ageing. In the future, growing numbers of older people will place more demands on our health system, and we need to make sure they can get the high-quality care they need.

That's why, on Wednesday, I launched National's Aged-Care Discussion Paper 'Choice Not Chance for Older New Zealanders'.

Older people tell us it's important to have real choices about how and where they live as they age, and what sort of care they get. National wants to make sure they have those choices.

Our discussion paper includes a number of proposals to improve care for the elderly. These include:

- Improved funding agreements with aged care providers that include an agreed increase in funding each year. This will give providers more certainty and improve their ability to provide care.

- Requiring all DHBs to provide dedicated respite residential-care beds. People who care for a loved one at home and can't get an occasional break are really struggling. We want older people and their families to get better access to respite care. At the moment, most DHBs don't fund dedicated respite beds, and many families have nowhere to turn.

- Setting up an Aged-Care Industry Training Organisation to oversee independent providers of training. This will boost the quality of care and give caregivers and nurses better career paths.

To see all our proposals and read the full discussion paper click here. Jo Goodhew and our health team have done a great job putting the paper together, and if you're interested in aged care I hope you'll read it and send us your feedback.

Electoral Finance Bill

Listen to my latest comments on the Electoral Finance Bill in an interview with Wallace Chapman of Kiwi FM.

Relief at Last for Fruit Growers

For months, we've been telling Labour that its Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme will choke our horticultural industry. For months, we've said that the scheme must overlap with the existing Seasonal Work Permit (SWP) scheme, or fruit growers won't be able to hire the workers they need in their critical picking season. And for months Labour has ignored us and told us that they know better.

But this week they finally caved in. On Thursday, Labour quietly announced that the SWP scheme will be extended. This is what National has been calling for, and after 18 months of frustration, fruit growers can finally get on with hiring the pickers they need.

Around the Central North Island

I had a really interesting few days in the Central North Island last week. I visited Port Taranaki in New Plymouth, and met some locals in the towns of Normanby and Ohawe Beach.

Chester Borrows and I got a briefing from the Wanganui Police about the tragic death of Jhia Te Tua, and what they are doing to combat gangs.

Then I had a fascinating visit with Environment Waikato in Taupo. We flew over much of the Taupo region, saw first-hand the deforestation and land-use changes that are going on as forestry is converted to dairying, and learnt about the impact this is having on the lake and the Waikato River.

There's just no substitute for talking to people who work at the coal-face about the challenges our country faces, and what National can do to build a better future for all New Zealanders.

 
John Key MP
Leader of the National Party


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Jack McFaull 2007-09-07 18:08 - (Reply)

John, I want the NZNp to acknowledge that Nuclear Power must be an energy option.

#1.1 - Luke Bailey 2007-09-07 20:17 - (Reply)

I dont agree with nuclear power,even as a solution to climate change and energy shortages.The nuclear free policy is a defining feature of New Zealands indentity and by extension its foreign policy an it means too much to New Zealanders too be revoked in the forseeable future. Also,Nuclear power generation requires an expensive and extensive infrastructure that would need to be built from the ground up.It is not merely a case of shipping uranium and putting it into a reactor.Even today New Zealand lacks the money and the experetise to build even one nuclear power plant. By all means National could say that nuclear power as an option but that would be tantamount to political suicide.Its too expensive (and dangerous) an option and runs counter to everything the National Pary stands for,that is an independent New Zealand and a safe place to live.

#1.2 - Rick Swan said:
2007-09-08 10:16 - (Reply)

I agree with John Key on this one. Nuclear waste remains lethal for durations of time approaching Geological timescales. We live in a seismically active country where there is no safe place to store nuclear waste. The risks posed therefore run counter to our primary industries and our clean green image that we wish to promote as an important food producer as well as a tourist destination. We have abundant wind, sun, rain, and ocean, so using the renewable nature of these resources to generate energy is the way to go, and this does not conflict with our primary industries. I think we can lead the world in this regard. Regards, Rick Swan ( www.cygnus1.com and supporter of www.savetheplanet.co.nz for alternative energy sources )

#1.2.1 - Anonymous 2007-09-08 17:41 - (Reply)

My apologies to John Keyand to Luke Bailey, as I have just discovered that I was actually replying to Luke Bailey's message, and not John Key's. Rick Swan.

#2 - Barb & Jim Steele 2007-09-07 20:20 - (Reply)

to John K, we have been involved with the Nat.party for years, you are the best leader we have had in decades & we will enjoy working for you & the party We heard Simon P speak recently, and were impressed, it is essential that you tackle this P problem, over 90% is produced by the gangs, W Aust has srong legislation to tackle it, Labour have been weak confronting the problem, good luck James Steele

#3 - Pete Fowler 2007-09-07 20:30 - (Reply)

Dear Mr. Key, all this ballyhoo about caring for our ageing population is a red herring, to provide an excuse to cut back on our welfare state. Our ability to generate wealth is increasing much faster than our population is ageing. It's time to stop rationing care for the sick, young, elderly and the rest. The wealthy can easily afford to pay more taxes, and still be richer than they were a few years back. Regards, Pete Fowler, Tuatapere, Southland.

#4 - Roland Green 2007-09-07 23:51 - (Reply)

Dear Mr Key, With respect to your initiatives on better care for the elderly. Without detracting from the worthiness of those initiatives, I do believe that there something else that is missing in your proposals. The problems that many people face as they get older is caused by not being able to make the right choices in times earlier to reaching the "aged" classification. There just isn't adequate attention given to assisting people to make those right choices. For instance, making good choices in eating healthy at an earlier age goes a long way towards helping maintain good health later in life. We are constantly bombarded of the importance of eating healthy but for many people on lower incomes, including people drawing the GRI, it is not possible to make those 'eating healthy' choices because of the higher costs. Apart from the soaring weekly grocery costs, people on lower incomes are battling to hold it together with all the other rising costs associated with maintaining a healthy lifestyle. It's about time that relief is given on essential living costs to bring good choices within the reach of people on fixed incomes like those on the GRI. One way of doing this is to exempt those on such incomes from paying GST on essential items, like essential foodstuffs, clothing, fuel, home heating, rates, public transport, to name just a few possibilities. The recently received 'Gold Card' is a joke. Anybody living south of Christchurch would be hard pressed to be able to use it in any meaningful manner. An opportunity gone begging to give seniors a helping hand towards making good choices to maintain a healthy lifestyle for as long as possible, thus possibly delaying the prospect of aged care. Since I've retired from full time work, I've given some of my time to the 'meals on wheels' programme. I find it deplorable that people who depend on that programme to have one decent, good meal a day have to pay for that service. How big a cost is that to subsidise? More to the point, how mean is that to ask an aged person who has made a lifelong contribution to the wellbeing of the nation. to pay for that service? I applaud your concerns for the aged, but I do believe you need to cast the net wider and further. For those able to pay more, pay more. For those less fortunate, pay less to help the income to go further on essentials. I hope your team will move in that direction. Regards. Roland Green, Oamaru.

#5 - G Hardie 2007-09-08 00:13 - (Reply)

Hi John I am encouraged and delighted to hear that you plan to have a heart towards the elderly in our country... There is little doubt that much improvement is needed as I recently had one of my close friends who has a grandmother who is 101, and her mother is 83. The grandmother lives in her own home and refuses to go into a home... The grandmother fell over and cut her head during the night and ended up in Hospital. Covered in bruises. When she got out of hospital, the mother and grand daughter where left to care for her. That meant full time care. After the mother hurt her shoulder lifting the grandmother out of the bed, the grand daughter decided that against the protests that her grandma was going into a home, as she had to work and wouldn't be available, but the homes where all full and as for home care...or is that long aftercare They still had to process the paperwork, a whole week later! Yes they eventually got through the red tape but just highlights the need for some changes... So I sincerely think it will be a step in the right direction... Which leads me to the question as to what the National Party plans, and thoughts towards reducing some of the red tape that Businesses and Departments and getting so fed up with? Some food for thought... What is the National Parties USP - how are you going to differentiate? In other words "what is in it for me" What compelling benefit or reason why I should vote for the National Party. And I am not referring to policy, as that is only the bullet points... Keep up the good work!

#6 - Mihai Dardaiac 2007-09-08 00:23 - (Reply)

Yeah John,you are the man,man...! Be sure I'll vote you!Please do not permit as PM nuclear power... You cannot imagine how much damage and tragedies could this produce. My family is still affected after Cernobyl, despite the fact we were living 1500 km. away from it ! And give Police much more power... Discipline and respect do not mean restricted liberties,you know what I mean?... Catch you latter, Mihai

#7 - Rod Lyons 2007-09-08 08:17 - (Reply)

I am disappointed the National PArty is suppporting Rodney Hide's Regulatory Responsibility bill. The fact little comment has been made is of further concern. If those drafting legislation and the parliamentarians who pass bills were doing what they are supposed to be doing this sort of review would be unnecessary. Rather than add yet more legislation why not simply require those responsible to simply do their jobs. I predict this will end up another blot on the landscape along the lines of the Resource Management Act.

#8 - george nichols 2007-09-08 08:21 - (Reply)

Up here in the Hokianga we have had the best health scheme in the whole country for many years. The doctor comes to our medical centre Waimamaku on Thursday, so we can be ill on Thursdays. It costs nothing. Any other time we get ourselves to Rawene hospital, own car or ambulance. Again it costs nothing. They sent me to Whangarei hospital for a prostate operation. Cost me nothing. George Nichols.

#8.1 - Nathan McCluskey 2007-09-10 09:05 - (Reply)

Make the most of it George. If National are elected next year and return to their policies of the 1990s, you can expect this to change.

#9 - Vic Hayes 2007-09-10 08:50 - (Reply)

Good morning - I have emailed you separately regarding the RVA and its cost effects on the Puriri Park Retirement Village. Please ensure your persons considering the independence of the aged see it. Thank you Vic

#10 - Jennie 2007-09-13 03:42 - (Reply)

I am very please to see that the National Party has taken action on the Seasonal Work permit scheme (SWP) for horticulture. This has been very successful and benefited both our horticultural and tourism industries, I was very confused when Labour wanted to drop it. I am currently in the US and see many young people who would love to work in New Zealand for a season which seems so well matched to our hort employers screaming out for people. Great to see the small issues being addressed by National as well as the big and real progress being made. Keep up the good work guys!

#11 - Doris Ward 2007-09-21 10:28 - (Reply)

I am very interested in your better care for the elderly. Could you please send me a copy as I cannot download it. I have been a carer of my husband for 23 years and am still working out and finding where I can get help. Day Care and Respite Care are becoming differcult to get as beds are not available when you need them and most day care very poor.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.