] NEWSLETTER: KEY NOTES No.33 - Rt Hon John Key
Newsletter

30 Comments
04 July 2008
NEWSLETTER: KEY NOTES No.33

SPORT FOR YOUNG KIWIS

On Monday I outlined National's policy for boosting the participation of young Kiwis in sport in this speech.  Watch my related video journal here.

Sport is an important part of growing up in New Zealand. Kids who are out there playing rugby or netball or soccer or softball, or any sport, aren't just getting fitter and healthier – they're learning about teamwork and co-operation, about playing fair, and about winning and losing. Regular involvement in organised sport is habit-forming.

The kids who play sport through their childhood and teen years are much more likely to be the adults who keep fit in later years. And I think we can make a significant difference to troubled young people if we can get more of them playing sport.

Participation by kids in sport is declining, but there are many benefits for kids and their communities, in increasing that participation.

I want a far more practical approach to funding sports by focusing government sporting dollars where they will make a difference – at the front line in schools and sports clubs.

National will:
- Give schools additional resources over time to ensure more students can take part in extra-curricula organised sport. 
- Ensure more of the government's sport spending gets through to the front line.

We will do this by carefully re-prioritising government funds currently dedicated to a host of bureaucratic anti-obesity campaigns. Ministers in a National-led government will be given clear priorities – more sports coaches and equipment, and fewer advisors and reports.

One striking thing that has occurred under Labour is the number of overlapping programmes and initiatives. It's hard to understand why we need at least eight different government programmes encouraging people to eat healthier and exercise more.

National will look at all these to ensure we get the balance right between funding promotional programmes and telling people to lead healthier lifestyles, and funding actual sports organisations with actual facilities where sport is actually played.

Another striking thing under Labour is how little of the budgeted millions actually flows through the bureaucracy and into schools and community organisations.

A report this week indicated that the average employee at Sparc earns more than the average employee at the Reserve Bank.

This year, Sparc will spend $5.5 million on its website, and between 2006 and 2010 it has budgeted $11.5 million for the website. That $11.5 million would give almost $6,000 worth of sports equipment to every primary school in New Zealand. That's a big boost the kids in every community could really benefit from.

CITIES AT A STANDSTILL

I struggled to get around Auckland this morning during the truck protest.

The Labour government has to step up and admit it was wrong to raise commercial road user charges without any warning on Monday night. It has shown contempt for the road transport industry and for businesses up and down the country.

The Minister of Transport promised the Road Transport Forum last year that she would modify the Road Users Charges Act so the Government could give truckies and other commercial road users a month's warning of any increases. The Minister's failure to do this is a breach of good faith.
 
The increase in the road user charge of about 7% for a typical truck comes at a time when the trucking industry is really struggling with higher fuel costs. These costs will eventually be passed on to all New Zealanders in the form of higher prices for food, clothing, and every other essential good that gets transported by road.

The hike in the road user charges for diesel vehicles came on the same day that Labour hiked the ACC levy on petrol by 2c a litre, and increased vehicle registration fees by $40 per vehicle.

These new costs for motorists and truckies were introduced just before Michael Cullen admitted that Labour paid a "premium" to buy the railway assets of Toll.

Hiking transport costs just when people are struggling with higher living costs and when Labour has paid several hundred million dollars too much for the trains and the ferries, is a slap in the face for every Kiwi road user, consumer, and taxpayer.

John Key MP
Leader of the National Party


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Lindsay Currie said:
2008-07-04 18:51 - (Reply)

Have been looking at what has gradually been happening now for over 12 months - the recession has been obvious to all but the politicians, and the reserve bank. Please make sure, that when national comes to power, you think of the people that make up NZ. labour has forgotten the average wage earner and small business. Times are very tough. Thank You

#2 - John Brady 2008-07-04 18:59 - (Reply)

I coached kids in sailing for some years, the effects it has in kids attitude and goals was unbelievable .All code of sport will have same effect. John keep up the good work dont get drawn into attacking labour just show the people how they can have a different Nz and you will lead. [we need a different path to follow] even god wont help us if the current continues j-b

#3 - Dave said:
2008-07-04 19:03 - (Reply)

Your on the money John NZ's need some direction and faith in strong future You are the man to deliver this! You have my total support Dave Perkin

#4 - Colin 2008-07-04 19:04 - (Reply)

John, What we really need to hear is what National will do about this sort of thing. We all know what King has done. People are asking, ' So what would National do? Are they going to repeal these rises in RUC? Cheers.

#4.1 - Cameron Pitches said:
2008-07-04 19:23 - (Reply)

Exactly. And what strategy does National or the Road Transport Forum have for escalating oil and diesel prices. Oil went to $145 a barrel today. What is the plan if it goes to $200 tomorrow? The trucking industry is totally reliant on diesel and as far as I know they don't have a hedging strategy at all for this. And all Maurice talks about is roads, roads, roads as if we still live in an era of cheap oil. Never a word about electricification of Aucklands rail network or public transport.

#5 - Rick Swan 2008-07-04 19:07 - (Reply)

To Rt Hon John Key : Dear Sir, Whilst understanding the need for health and sport in the populace, what I perceive to be one of the the greatest areas of neglect is in science education, research, and employment opportunities for those with these skills. For example, we have had enormous opportunities for producing our very own bio-fuels to lower our dependence on imported oil, but what has been done about that in the the last 20 years ? There are many other examples like this. Surely there must have been those with enough foresight to have seen this coming. It will take another hurricane Katrina in the Gulf of Mexico, or another major war in the the Middle East, and our economy could grind to a complete standstill. Sports people are perceived as heroes while those with potentially far greater value to our economy are looked upon as "nerds". There is something fundamentally flawed with our nation's outlook and treatment of gifted people. No wonder they are going elsewhere where they are more appreciated, to our great loss. Deeply concerned about our "head in the sand" culture. Rick Swan.

#5.1 - James REad 2008-07-04 20:00 - (Reply)

I am delighted at National's look at sport in primary schools, knowing from personal experience of their lack of equiptment. However, I'm less sure about using SPARCs funds to provide it. Sport can keep our children off the streets and out of trouble. It is SPARC which can provide activities outside school hours. I've known out of school activities be provided outside their work by people as diverse as teachers, policeofficers and naval officers, but funds are needed.

#6 - June Lamont 2008-07-04 19:12 - (Reply)

Llistening to talk back this afternoon, Danny Watson said why didn't John Key stand up and say what he would do if he becomes PM on the issue of the road taxes and continuing road taxes that are going to be issued by local government. It's quite frightening that Auckland might get a further increase by local government. Isn't the Government raking it in now especially with GST on top of the taxes!

#7 - David Pemberton 2008-07-04 19:12 - (Reply)

The Road User Charge is a farce- my charges were increased by nearly 30% a year ago for my small VW Golf diesel which is very fuel efficient. Surely Government should be reducing the tax take on small diesels? Hopefully a National Government will look at the RUC system to encourage motorists to drive more fuel-efficient vehicles.

#8 - Cleone Blomfield 2008-07-04 19:14 - (Reply)

Steel on steel is very old technology so what about concreting the tracks and using the subsequent highway somehow differently! I remember this being discussed in "The Economist" in the 1970's.

#9 - Rick Swan 2008-07-04 19:23 - (Reply)

..Just one clarification about my previous message : Bio-fuels need not compete with food production. They can be made from human sewage, using algae into bio-diesel, or from woody waste biomass ( forestry waste, corn stover etc ) into ethanol. Regards, Rick Swan.

#10 - Robyn Carter said:
2008-07-04 19:29 - (Reply)

Labour has just dug their own grave with this current hike of petrol/diesel charges. The average New Zealander is struggling. We're been squeezed every which way, and then Labour tries to squeeze us further. It's time they cut spending - we can no longer afford their spending budget. I laugh at Helen Clark's arrogance at ignoring the polls too - for the last 10 years the polls have been very very accurate. I think there will be a landslide election in favour of national. Who knows - there may not be even the need for smaller parties to hold us at the throat either! Let labour gaff from now on like this - they're just digging their own early grave! Roll on election day - let the people speak! Cheers Robyn

#11 - Ian Grant 2008-07-04 19:34 - (Reply)

Seems to me that Labour is deliberately trying to lose the election. This will leave National carrying the can for poor economic performance of the next few years. Result? National might be a one term govt. Is this the Helen agenda? How will you combat it?

#12 - Sue Hamilton 2008-07-04 19:35 - (Reply)

How on earth can ANYONE spend $5.5million on a website - that's an outrage. Enough is enough. I agree with Mr Swan on the need to work on other areas of education but perhaps he's not aware of your other thoughts on education - which have been coming out for a while - sure there is more to come! Keep kids in sport and out of court is the old adage - and when they are fit they are able to learn to be scientists, entrepreneurs, teachers .... Best of luck

#13 - Tony Loorparg 2008-07-04 19:37 - (Reply)

I agree with your sports policy,however I have observed that one of the major problems in increasing sports activity is the difficulty that many qualified sports trainers (ie those who could be on the front line)have in earning an adequate living wage .Many go through tertiary training eg 12 -24 month study programme and have great difficulty on graduating, in coping with having to be small businessmen as well .Some are very successful but most eke out a living as "contractors" to gyms etc until they leave the profession for something more lucrative, When I was at primary school in the !950's we used to have district sports trainers coming to our school on a regular basis to put us through"the hoops".These people were basically what the Army called Physical Training Instructors without necessarily having formal teaching qualifications and they were very popular. Is there no way that these people can be retained and encouraged better for the ultimate benefit to our young?

#14 - David Schell 2008-07-04 19:43 - (Reply)

Getting money through the administration to where it is usefull is THE challenge.It is a problem in sport and an absolute farse in health and education. It has been a hallmark of this labour Govt. to create the apparent need for huge, self paralyseing beauracracies.

#15 - Neil Woodward 2008-07-04 19:54 - (Reply)

I find it difficult to believe that the Clark government has so disassociated itself from the people of New Zealand that they continue to ride roughshod over us. The waste within the bureaucracy, if saved, would go a long way towards funding the things they keep claiming to throw money at. Today I have spoken to a lot of people who fully support the protest by truck drivers. Do Clark and her cohorts not realize that these people are in the main long term Labour supporters who have now had more than enough. As for the attempted muckraking as to who owned shares in what some 15 years ago - if this is the worst they can do, you should feel considerably heartened about your election prospects, I doubt that many thinking Kiwis care and more of us think than Labour believe. Woody

#16 - Ron Nicholls 2008-07-04 19:55 - (Reply)

I think you will find John that very few New Zealanders are bringing up baby Goats, known in farming circles as Kids. Most of us raise Children and are pleased to do so as well as we can. Please try to show some respect for our young people in your public utterances . You are after all not working for TVNZ who consider this type of belittlement acceptable. Children are not Kids. Let's start respecting our Children. Think about it. Good luck to you in the forthcoming Elections. Ron

#17 - John Hanning 2008-07-04 20:09 - (Reply)

Congratulations for acknowledging that too much funding for sport is being eroded at the wrong level. Not too many years ago sports clubs could make an application to the Lotteries Grants Commission for funding - now the stock answer is that you are not eligible as funding for sport goes to SPARC who fund the "national" organisations and clubs should approach them foir funding (what a joke!). The exceptions under lotteries now applies to ethnic groups, disabled etc. But try to get support to upgrade EG. toilet access and facilities for the disadled. Such support is bound up in that much red tape that the average club has no show. If the burocracy doesnt get you the resource consent act will !! Please don't get me on that track. Good luck with your efforts to put available funding where it should be - November can't come soon enough for forward thinking New Zealanders

#18 - Duane Donovan 2008-07-04 20:10 - (Reply)

Dear Mr Key I note that very quickly after your speech on youth in sport the CEO of SPARC has responded by disputing a number of the facts. Is this an example of government departments not providing the opposition accurate information which they can use when formulating policy, only to turn on them once that policy is released? I would hate to see this dynamic and exciting policy statement to be watered down by arguing about numbers. Thank you for your bold step forward and wanting to help our children lead healthy lives. Regards Duane Donovan - Dunedin

#19 - D Bate 2008-07-07 10:42 - (Reply)

Right on! I dont think labour or the greens have ever lived in the real world. Its quite tough out there at the moment and bad timing for buying large assets (rail) and hiking RUCs and surcharges on fuel for ACC etc. David Auckland

#20 - Tony Black 2008-07-07 16:40 - (Reply)

I applaud your enthusiasm in getting young NZ kids playing more sport but there really is lttle point in providing it to schools that dont have enough classrooms for the children going to them or the necessary funding to source suitable teachers. Schools should be designed with a think bid attitude instead of just enough attitude. Three prototype schools that were supposedly "the benchmark" for the country's schooling format are now the three biggest bungles in education history (Albany Senior High, Junior High and Upper Harbour Primary). Our current Education Minister and Government would have to be the laughing stock of the Western world to allow our schooling in Albany to be in such chaos. Helen Clarke promised in person to the residents that the new Senior High would be up and running well before it was needed... now look at it! The only vote she would get from myself or most of the residents in Albany is one of NO CONFIDENCE!

#21 - michael hooper 2008-07-07 19:34 - (Reply)

Hi John, keep doing what you know is best, don't give clark any ammo, she and cullen are deliberately pushing the country into economic stress in order to make it very difficult for National when you get in, tell the voters this, of course many are to brainwashed to understand but at least make people aware. Continue with a tax reduction package regardless because it will get the country going again, and reduce the drag on the country by unproductive people. We in Selwyn need a strong National candidate I sincerly hope you have one available. We wish you all the very best, you have our support (our entire family) best regards MikeH

#21.1 - Mark 2008-07-09 08:28 - (Reply)

Hey John. THANKYOU. Godspeed. What an arrogance of a govt we have had. NZ has become to PC. Trying to push their own lifestyle and hidden a gender. What Labour has passed, we, the average NZer will be paying for for years and years to come. Bring back accountability for peoples actions. pack your bags ! your going all the way !! Dont listen to a scared man with a female name. Helen has such double standards. can you please tell us how many laws were passed under urgency leading up to the last election.

#22 - Ken Meredith 2008-07-07 23:28 - (Reply)

With the incredible increase in wholesale prices in fuel oil leading to a total rise across the board for the household budget in every home, it is time for the government to bite the bullet and either abolish or drastically reduce excise duty on motor fuel to restore the purchasing power for those on fixed incomes. They will inevitably recoup much of their lost revenue in GST. So what if they have to cut back the roading budget somewhat - What use have people for new roads if they cannot afford to use them?

#23 - Andy Wilgermein 2008-07-08 08:17 - (Reply)

Just a point that seems to be missed regarding the higher fuel costs. The government has had a huge Tax increase from the higher prices. The revenue from GST alone on fuel would have almost doubled in the last 12 months or so. Why is this Excessive windfall not channelled into roading. This windfall alone should have negated any need to increase road user charges or ACC levies and still left a huge amount in the Kitty for roading. I would like the National Party to be more vocal in pushing this point across.

#23.1 - Anonymous 2008-07-08 09:58 - (Reply)

A good point well said, but seemingly ignored by media and politicians. John, you could well be pushing this point.

#24 - John Buckley 2008-07-08 10:03 - (Reply)

Hi John, depends what you mean by 'sport'. If this is contact sports like rugby then this is not the way to go. Haveing had two grandsons injured I cannot support this, there are so many sports out there but why should the schools be responsible as the main purpose is to educate children to live in the real world and to earn a living. As for the road user charges, the suggestion that the truckies should pay for the roads they use is wrong, the trucks are not being used to take indeviduals to work or whatever but are carrying the goods required to support this countries economy, we, the public, ALL benefit from the trucks on our roads. As for the rail after years in private sector ownership and a disastrous curtailing of passenger transport by these same owners what would National have done to revive this run down sytem? As a superannuitant, what has National done for me? My private super has been a disaster due to National policies from the 1990's Please give more real objectives for National if it is returned to the treasury benches, no flannel just the facts. Thanks John B

#25 - Sandy Robertson said:
2008-07-08 15:55 - (Reply)

John, On several occasions I have heard you refer to government growing by 35,000 employees under Labour. I feel this could be expressed in a better way. I do not have the figures nor the skills to express my thinking but I'm sure you have the resources to have this done. To get my thoughts across, let's say the mean growth was 17,500 employees over the period and let's say the average salary per employee was $50,000 for the purpose of illustrating what I'm getting at, the cost burden on the taxpayer would be $875,000,000 pa. min. Your folk should be able to come up with a figure taking into account realistic salaries and all the added costs such as Superannuation Kiwi Saver, supervision, housing, transport, ACC, and on it goes. I think you would come up with a staggering cost amounting many billions over the period. It seems to me this is the figure the Public should be made aware of not just the number of people involve. How much would that waste go toward Tax cuts ? I believe a great deal of milage could be developed around this thought. Cheers. S.R.

#26 - Roger Brittenden said:
2008-10-02 06:58 - (Reply)

As Judge Mick Browne is fond of saying, "A child in sport is child not in court".


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.