] NEWS: Labour admits failure in education - Rt Hon John Key
News release

1 Comment
19 September 2008
NEWS: Labour admits failure in education

National Party Leader John Key says Helen Clark's education announcements today amount to a reheat of a policy first outlined in 2002.

"In 2002, Labour signed the Mayor's Taskforce for Jobs agreement declaring 'every 15-to-19-year-old be engaged in work, training, education, or another constructive activity for their future**' by 2007.  The fact that Helen Clark is making the same announcement just weeks out from the 2008 election is an admission of failure under her watch over the past nine years.

"Currently around one in five school students doesn't gain a qualification by the time they leave school, more than a third of students leave school without having gained a Level 2 or higher qualification, and nearly 13,000 teenagers are receiving a government benefit.  Why should we believe Helen Clark will get to her 2014 goal this time around?

"More than 25,000 Kiwis aged 15-19 are not in any form of education, training or work – that's despite Labour's promise to get that number down to zero. Those young people are disengaged from education and are at a loose end."

Mr Key says Labour's hastily revised 'School Plus' plan is a pale imitation of National's more flexible and practical Youth Guarantee, which recognises the rich diversity of training and people's circumstances.

"Helen Clark today has also gone some way to admitting the mistake she made early this year when she announced that she simply planned to raise the school leaving age to 18.  But it is way too late in the day for the public to trust that she can make any headway, given the lack of results since Labour first announced this policy six years ago."

Mr Key says National's Youth Guarantee is about giving young New Zealanders the opportunity and responsibility to better themselves, no matter what their circumstances.
• National will provide a universal education entitlement for all 16- and 17-year-olds.  This will allow them to access, free of charge, a programme of educational study towards school-level qualifications.
• Most will continue their education at school.  However, the entitlement will allow 16- and 17-year-olds to access education at a non-school provider if it can better meet their needs.  For example, a polytechnic, wananga, or private training establishment.
• Courses offered under the Youth Guarantee will have to meet strict quality criteria.
• This new entitlement will be on top of, not instead of, the education entitlements young people have now.
• Sixteen and 17-year-olds who are not working, and who fail to take up this new entitlement, will not be eligible to receive a benefit.

"National will provide fresh enthusiasm and fresh leadership to lift our educational sights.  Quite simply, Helen Clark and Labour have shown they can't."


** http://www.jobsletter.org.nz/mtfjobs/mtfjobs59.htm & Press Release from Hon. Steve Maharey, 'This government is fully committed to its shared goal with the Mayors' Taskforce for Jobs of having all 15-19 year olds in work, education, training or other meaningful activities by the end of this year.' - 28 August 2007.
For details of National's Youth Guarantee visit: http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=28239
For details of National's Trades in Schools visit:: http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleId=28238


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Louis Tousain 2008-09-21 07:14 - (Reply)

Dear reader, I welcome the National party's initiative for 16 & 17 year olds. I am however far more concerned about the NCEA system. I believe that NCEA does not provide a quality education. We have 2 daughters, now 18 & 20, who have gone through the NCEA system in a public school. They were both above average achievers. I believe NCEA is not a system which makes students strive for excellence. It dumms people down. The whole system of credits and unit standards is utterly confusing to most people, certainly potential employers. My youngest does not sit units standards as they are either marked as achieved or not-achieved. She states these lower her average, as she aims for getting excellences. I understand that many students enroll in meaningless topics, in order to get the required number of credits. There is even talk about reducing the number of credits to get NCEA level 1. In short, I am waiting with eager expectation on the National Party overhauling the NCEA system. I was raised in Holland. The secondary school system was very simple. Throughout the school year there were internal exams, which made up 50% of your mark. At the end of the year there was the eternal state exam, which provided the second 50%. No school enjoyes to see a big gap between the internal and external marks. Roll on 8 November!!!


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.