] NEWS: National - Better value from your taxes - Rt Hon John Key
News release

3 Comments
16 October 2008
NEWS: National - Better value from your taxes

National Party Leader John Key says an incoming National-led Government will treat every dollar it spends as carefully as householders do when they're totting up the weekly budget.

"In the period immediately ahead, families and businesses will have no option but to behave with restraint, and will be entitled to see similar restraint reflected in the operation of the government agencies funded by their taxes.

"Years of unfocused and largely unmanaged growth have left a public service that is unbalanced between head office administrators and frontline service providers. Productivity levels are too low and now represent an impediment to the better growth levels our economy must achieve.

"National will improve productivity across the public sector by ensuring there is a strong focus on the provision of frontline services that New Zealanders and their families rely on, and by reining in the growth of the back-room bureaucracy.

"We have previously announced we will put a cap on the size of the core bureaucracy to allow a re-balancing to occur as available resources are moved to the front line.

"National will require departmental chief executives to undertake a line-by-line review of their expenditure, with the goal of identifying areas where savings in government administration can be made.

"And we'll establish a Cabinet Expenditure Control Committee to oversee this process and to consider chief executives' reports on potential savings.

"Based on the information it receives, the committee will be able to initiate in-depth spending reviews of particular areas of government administration to ensure the best value for taxpayers and users of public services.

"This is a time in which the public sector must play its part by seeking to improve productivity and the delivery of core services to the public."

National will:
• Cap the size of the core bureaucracy in the first term of government, and ensure that priority is given to delivering frontline services that directly benefit New Zealanders.
• Limit new spending in its first Budget to the priorities we have identified in the election campaign and non-discretionary pressures that cannot be deferred or absorbed.
• Require departmental chief executives to undertake a line-by-line review of their expenditure with the goal of identifying areas where savings in government administration can be made.
• Establish a Cabinet Expenditure Control Committee to oversee this process and to consider chief executives' reports on potential savings.

National recognises there is a high level of professionalism and competence in New Zealand's public service. What is needed is effective political leadership that sets clear goals that are professionally communicated.

National will:
• Recognise the professionalism of public servants and expect high-quality, timely advice.
• Promote an environment of professionalism and mutual respect.
• Allow advisers to take part in Cabinet committee discussions where appropriate.

At 1 July 2008, government departments employed 505 public relations, communications, media staff and contractors. Six years ago they employed 238. New Zealanders know the service provided by these departments isn't twice as good.

National will work to restore a sense of balance and proportion.

National will:
• Restore the absolute commitment to the political neutrality of the public service.
• Ensure that public service departments are not used for party political gain.
• Reduce the number of communications and public relations advisers across the public service

"While National is prepared to lay out a plan to get more value for the taxes spent on back room bureaucracy, Labour is asking struggling New Zealand families to write them a blank cheque. Helen Clark has offered no advice on what she would do differently in tougher economic times. A mini-Budget after the election is not good enough," Mr Key says. 


Follow this link to download (PDF) state services paper
http://national.org.nz/files/2008/state_services_policy.pdf


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - David Rutherford 2008-10-17 11:16 - (Reply)

I totally agree with your comments regarding the number of state sector employees. I also like the way you keep on referring to peoples household budgets in relation to managing the countries finances. It's a good way to get into peoples living rooms and kitchens by displaying a genuine empathy for their situations, give's people the feeling we are all in this together, well done.

#2 - RJM 2008-10-17 20:11 - (Reply)

Yes it all sounds good and no doubt needs a major trim, but I suspect it will only be a trim instead of cut. I think it has to go a lot further than has been put forward. It always amazes me that for a nation of 4 million people why we have got so many district councils , regional councils, dhb's, mp's etc,etc. We even have case where district councils are taking a regional council to court over office relocation. It would be interesting to know how many people are funded by rates or taxs in gods own a country with a population that doesnt even equal a good size city by world standards. Its nuts really, makes it easy to see why are not to productive. Start sorting that out & you will find some savings & see the kiwi spirit lift. Ray

#2.1 - Tom Ledger 2008-10-18 07:39 - (Reply)

Ditto. Even National has commented on the excess duplication rendered by our DHBs. Alas they also made a commitment not to do away with them. Perhaps a few mergers would create savings while not going back on commitments. My particular beef is the Ministry of Womens Affairs. What a political sop, a rest home for overpaid middle aged tertiary educated feminist's sucking on the public teet, produceing reports that achieve next to nothing and rest in a fileing cabinet. Have they not heard the term Post Feminist Era??? Line by line savings searches by CEOs might sound good, but reality is that the admin systems are the problem. They need efficiency in admin practice, not more reems of box ticking and report writing that nobody benefits from. Far too much time is wasted on this irrelevant information gathering, why must I always put my ethnicity on every damn form?? Surely our universities can provide services for a fraction of the cost when studies are required. Make opportunities for undergrads to be productive as they learn.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.