] NEWS: National to deliver ultra-fast broadband to schools - Rt Hon John Key
News release

5 Comments
05 November 2008
NEWS: National to deliver ultra-fast broadband to schools

A National-led Government will invest at least $150 million over the next three years to ensure schools can make the most of ultra-fast broadband, says National Party Leader John Key.

"This is where the future is", he said during a visit to Clover Park Middle School and the 'Computer Clubhouse' in Otara today.

"Clover Park is a computer-savvy school that makes the most of ultra-fast broadband. Pupils here are being equipped for tomorrow with 21st century skills and the use of cutting-edge information technology.

"Too many young New Zealanders are missing out on opportunities like these.

"I want all New Zealand schools to be able to provide amazing learning environments like these for their pupils. A National-led Government will back schools to make sure they can.

"I have previously announced National's commitment to investing up to $1.5 billion to accelerate the roll-out of ultra-fast broadband to 75% of New Zealanders. Schools will be a priority in that roll-out.

"I will make sure that when we run the fibre into schools they're ready to light the information and communication technologies match.

"That's why I'm announcing $150 million of investment to improve schools' internal broadband networks and make them 'fibre-ready'.

"The possibilities for new teaching and learning approaches using video-conferencing, virtual learning, and international information portals will change the face of education globally.

"I want New Zealand schools to be part of that change.

"National will also work with schools to purchase new computer desktops and cluster servers, and to ensure there is adequate technical support.

"The funding for this initiative will come from National's Infrastructure Building Plan, which allows for $8.6 billion of new capital for new infrastructure projects over the next six years.

"Unlike Labour, National has carefully budgeted to make sure we can deliver on our commitments."

NOTE: Clover Park is a decile 1 public school, and its campus also hosts Te Whanau o Tupuranga, which provides Maori-immersion education. Clover Park has partnered with the Computer Clubhouse Trust and hosts a purpose-built technology facility. This facility is funded by a not-for-profit NGO.

Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Neil Woodward 2008-11-06 16:56 - (Reply)

John, using some rather loose figures, something like 90% of the countries income is produced by some 10% of the population, all in rural area. When are we going to see you or anyone else making noises about providing fast broadband at a reasonable cost to us in this sector. I would suggest that our needs actually exceed the needs of that 90% of people in the urban areas and improvements to our service would have a very positive spin off effectfor urban users. We are the forgotten people!

#2 - Greg Stevenson said:
2008-11-07 10:18 - (Reply)

Improving New Zealand’s Education System The following are my thoughts on how NZ can improve their Education System and how NZ Government can put more substance to the policy shift to a "Knowledge Based Economy". My ideas are based almost entirely on what is proving to be the most successful business development model the Information Technology sector has ever experienced. Its catch phrase often called "Open Source". It is the principal behind how a Computer Operating System called "Linux" has become capable of going head to head with a Microsoft's Windows operating system. It is very much a "David & Goliath" story. The principle is that individuals give away the best of their efforts with the common end of improving a system. I believe this principle can be used to dramatically improve many systems, but that the Education system lends itself well to the idea. The key reasons for this are that (most) Teachers regard their job as a Vocation and that the premise behind "Education" is, the transfer of knowledge. As a lead to how to improve the transfer of knowledge I present these assumptions 1. "Teachers" are NZ's Education Systems biggest resource. 2. Computers are an effective Education Tool. 3. An individual Teacher cannot be an expert at everything. 4. Virtually every NZ School has Internet access to some degree. A practical system of implementing the principle of "Open Source" would be. 1. Create a resource using Current Computer and Internet Technology. This would consist of developing a (or improving an existing eg. http://www.cwa.co.nz/eduweb/index.html) single Internet based Web Site containing a database. It should be structured to be a representation of the current school Curriculum from pre-school to end of secondary school. eg. Geography topics divided by year 0 (preschool) to year 12 (7th Form). The site would have read access by anyone and a structured write access by registered teachers. 2. Make it compulsory for every registered Teacher to take an approved one day training course on the principle of "Open Source" and the practical aspect of writing and retrieving information from the database. 3. Make it compulsory to publish to this database, at least one Lesson Plan per teacher. The copyright to this lesson plan would be in line with the GNU copyright, which is that anyone can use the lesson plan as long as acknowledgment to the original Author remains intact. 4. Teachers could apply to take a one year paid sabbatical whereby they read submissions, assess, and create abstracts where necessary and file all submissions appropriately in the database. Only one sabbatical per teacher. 5. An Administration team of say three individuals would be paid as full time employees to administer the team of Teachers assessing the submissions and to keep the database up at all times. 6. Actively advertise the resource. This would include the standard means of Internet advertising. Links from other Web Sites, newsgroups, chat channels, Banner exchanges, e-mail etc. Printed ads in education gazettes etc. And an initial TV advertising campaign. 7. Develop and encourage an anonymous rating system by all registered teachers for lessons plans used in the classroom. This would be divided into sections such as Effectiveness, Ease of use, Availability of associated resources etc, and of course, an overall rating. 8. Revisions to Lesson Plans would be submitted by any teacher and could either be approved by original Author(s) or published as an entirely new Lesson Plan by the revising Author. 9. Develop an enhancement to the system whereby the submissions to change the base curriculum are also accepted filed, peer reviewed, and rated. The above practical implementation provide the benefits of:- 1. A central resource for lesson plans and related resources. A teacher may never have to write a lesson plan again. A teacher may never have to write a set up questions or exam again. A teacher could up skill in knowledge and techniques quickly and privately based on the best submissions their peers have to offer. 2. The government of the day will have a quick feedback of areas of concern in the current curriculum. This will enable them to implement change in a timely fashion. 3. By searching on ratings of Authors published Lesson Plans, School Administrators will have one more information source, to base the abilities of their workforce, or potential workforce. This would be over and above CVs, written and verbal references and recorded academic achievements. Conversely a Teacher can get recognised for their specialist abilities by their peers rather than their employment superiors. What would be needed to achieve such a System? A commitment by the Government to the allocation of funds, say a couple of million dollars, most of which would be spent on Teacher Training and Advertising. This would be a one off and could possibly be in the form of a NERF project with a portion being a long term loan to be paid off from advertising revenues that the site would eventually command. The paid sabbaticals would be an ongoing cost to the Government and the cost would be totally dependent on numbers required. Those who took up such a post would invariably come out more highly educated. Finally, although this could be eventually run totally commercially, my preference would be for such a system to be owned by a SOE. This would is far more in keeping with the "OPEN SOURCE" principle. Keep this asset owned by New Zealand. Greg Stevenson Primesoft NZ Ltd

#3 - Mak Kulkarni 2008-12-11 22:14 - (Reply)

Was hoping to get a clarification on this statement "I will make sure that when we run the fibre into schools they're ready to light the information and communication technologies match. "That's why I'm announcing $150 million of investment to improve schools' internal broadband networks and make them 'fibre-ready'. So what do you mean by "Schools' internal broadband networks and make them fibre ready"? Does it mean you want to upgrade the internal cabling and switching networks for schools so that they are ready when superfast broadband can be delivered or does it mean you will provide fibre to the school's door?

#4 - Margot Brown said:
2008-12-12 14:13 - (Reply)

I think that this is a far better way to spend taxpayers money, improving the schools and approving funding for space in the already crowded school system. Kids have so much experience on computers already that it will only enhance their learning ability. There are also so many good programs available on the computer such as Word Shark, Number Shark, Type to Learn and many others. If kids love to use computers then surely they will love to keep learning. However, I definitely do not think that creating a schools standardised testing system is good use of taxpayer money. I also wonder why this is being pushed through so quickly? Did I miss something this election year? Have you talked to the teachers and the kids that will be involved in orchestrating this once the tests are set? I am a NZ'er who has returned from overseas (yes, one the many who loves to call NZ home). We came from the US, my kids were born there, and we left for one main reason, the school system. My son who is 10 never wants to back to school there because of standardised testing which is in place to measure the schools and performance not the kids and there abilities. The kids sit 10-14 days of tests that don't account for any of their grades, they are stressed out and worried about their results. Teachers don't like it but have to teach for the tests otherwise the school gets a bad rating. Some schools all they do is teach for the testing and on a whole ignore the ciriculum! All for the sake of a good rating and budget from the state. NO matter how much you say it will not turn into the US system and others like it, you are already half way there by voting it in to begin with. It's only a matter of time. Stop and think before you leap and try doing some research in other countries like Australia and the US before rushing in. Regards, Margot Brown (Concerned Parent Christchurch)

#4.1 - Greg said:
2008-12-12 16:56 - (Reply)

Numeracy and literacy skills are important and as you mention, computers can help with that by providing a learning environment students enjoy. My worry is that teachers, in general, don't enjoy that environment and by the time their students are about 10 years old the students have surpassed the teacher in comfort with that learning medium, and more often than not expertise. Making sure the teachers stay one step ahead is vitally important for them to hold the respect of their students. This doesn't mean that teachers need to know all the answers, but it does mean they know how to structure the questions. They need to be able to work in the abstract and show students how to do so as well. The direction the world is headed is not the retention of facts but the instant delivery of reliable facts via connected resources. In my experience what holds progress back is not Hardware (computers and faster connection speeds) Not the software (Applications like Word shark) it is almost always the expertise on how to use it. Thank goodness the children are learning this faster than the teachers. As for standardised testing I think there is always a happy medium. Under Labour I fear we had swung too far one way. They knew it and attempted to address it themselves with merit and excellence passes in NCEA, but too little too late I'm afraid. The system certainly destroyed all incentive to excel in my daughter and has in part motivated her to drop out of the academic system. (She passed with too little effort) Everyone needs to learn the consequences of failure, and how to come back from a failure. This skill needs to be taught compassionately in schools. Somewhere down the track everyone is destined to experience it. Prepare them for it in small ways that keep them on track. Outside the academic world, failure such as bankruptcy and job loss can often be too harsh a lesson.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.