#2 - Kathy Williams 2009-04-02 08:19 - (Reply)

Hi I am a Training Manager and recently the decision was made to assess the business and restructure/disestablish some positions, one of which is mine. I am not concerned about my position but am very concerned for those who will be let go with minimal financial support for them and their families. I have been working in the training field with Polytechnics, ITOs and Industry for near on 20 years all told but the most recent years (7) within the Infrastructure industry. As a non-traditional trade industry, the acceptance of training and recognision for the quality and skills of their people has been fraught with barriers and obstacles. Recently there has been more commitment in the senior levels of the industry but I question the methodology, support and commitment in the lower management levels. The decision makers are solely focussed on compliance and profit, not employee development. Say what you like, but the important message needs to be from that middle/lower management arena. To "Walk the Talk" would be an admirable quality. In saying this I also believe that the concept of Workplace instructors and tutors is a real plus. Field workers are not comfortable learning in the classroom, they learn more out in the field and "doing it". As kinesthetic learners this is the way they become successful and competant. The outcome eventually is for them to achieve quality work through those skills and knowledge. Literacy/numeracy are essential skillsets but do we have the time to help them be successful if we ask them to learn from traditional methodology. We need to incorporate the learning into their daily work activities. Your recent summit and the polytechnic's commitment is admirable, I question their motives and the practicality to implement and achieve successful outcomes. Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. I would be happy to meet and discuss further with you at a time that is convenient. [ADMIN: EDITED OUT PHONE NUMBER]