4 Comments
07 April 2009
Rodney Hide: Representation guaranteed for all Aucklanders

Local Government Minister Hon Rodney Hide said today the Government's decisions on the governance of Auckland would provide effective representation for all Aucklanders.

Speaking at the release of the Government's high-level decisions on Auckland governance, Mr Hide highlighted the decision to establish 20 to 30 Community Boards across the region, each of which would be named after its local community.

The Local Government Commission will determine the exact number of boards and their boundaries, as well as the boundaries of the Auckland Council and its wards. It will report back in April 2010.

"The new system for Auckland governance is much simpler, more co-ordinated and will provide for community representation at grassroots level. The Local Boards will have prescribed roles and functions, but will not replicate the service delivery structures that will be managed by the new Auckland Council, which will replace the existing eight councils. 

"The Boards will provide the ability for residents and ratepayers to influence decision making, while the Council will fulfil the functions that are most appropriately managed on a regional basis.

"Whether it be through the Mangere or Henderson Board, the Pukekohe or Papakura Board, the Waiheke or Devonport Board, local communities need to be able to manage local issues and express their identities. That is what makes Auckland special." Reflecting their geographic position, the smaller communities of Great Barrier and Waiheke Islands will each have Local Board representation.

Mr Hide said the Government had rejected the Royal Commission's proposal of six local councils because it would mean unnecessary and costly duplication of service delivery, and be too large to allow effective grassroots community representation. "We now have a simpler, clearer governance structure that provides strong leadership at the regional level and community representation at the local level. This is the foundation stone upon which we will make Auckland a great place to live, and drive New Zealand's economic growth.

"It is essential the new structure is in place in time for the local body elections in 2010. This means we have chosen to have a faster timetable than the Royal Commission was looking at.

"However I want to reassure Aucklanders that the everyday services they expect from their councils will be maintained while the changes are being made.The new structure will provide room for greater efficiencies through less duplication and waste, as well as faster progress on issues which have gone unresolved for years, such as transport.

"It is imperative that the new Auckland Council focuses on the future of Auckland and how it is going to turn Auckland into an internationally competitive city. The newly-appointed Council should not be distracted or encumbered by having to carry out an organisational restructuring. This will be the responsibility of the Establishment Board which the Government will appoint.

"The Establishment Board will work closely with existing council CEOs throughout the transition process. The councils have committed to a steering group and this will be an important and valuable contributor to the development work. It will also be vital to a smooth transition.

"We need to act decisively if we are to achieve the timetable that will allow the new structure to be established before October next year. This will allow Aucklanders to have their say on whom they want to run their region and represent their communities."


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Jane Sherard said:
2009-04-10 07:05 - (Reply)

Tena koe e Prime Minister John Key As I had commented to you at the Kumeu Police Station, Auckland as a metropolitcan city did require a step up as it was not maximising its natural capital. Unfortunately, it still is not! The Local Government Minister's earlier comments on his concern for lack of local representation did elude to this type of decision. As one of the CEs of Ngati Whatua, it was always going to be the 'numbers' game in democracy that will prevail to the detriment of the manawhenua iwi within their own tribal rohe. Even with the best orchestrated 'block voting', Ngati Whatua hapu areas of Orakei and South Kaipara will never be able to have enough people to create a ward Council seat letalone one for Orakei (Auckland City to Tamaki River, Otahuhu) and one for South Kaipara (Rodney, North Shore, Waitakere). Law of averages and political prowless of 'protective patching' from the current Council CEOs predicts this. However I do consider it prudent for both the Establishment and Transitional Boards to have at least the tribal CEOs on the membership as well as the current Council CEOs as well once the Government does its appointment process. Whether my Board or Tribe would allow this to occur once the dust settles is yet another question to be yet asked should you and Rodney Hide be that brave to concur amid the current responses from our various Maori leaders. I consider change is constant and we are option-rich so I would encourage you put pressure to bear on Rodney Hide to think ahead in terms of local representation which also is inclusive of manawhenua iwi (within their own ancestral lands). Auckland does itself a disservice because it ignores the "Cultural Capital" it has on its doorstep in terms of Ngati Whatua within its own tribal area. Kaiarataki (Pathfinder) CE

#1.1 - Sam Bearda 2009-04-13 08:33 - (Reply)

Auckland does not need a "new" council. Give the ARC the powers that the "supercity" council would have, keep the present "city" councils as subservient bodies to the new ARC and let the new ARC levy rates. Elect all members of the new ARC by a ward system with the chairman/mayor elected at large and the leaders of the "city" councils together with maori be appointed as members of the ARC. Anybody who is elected to the new ARC cannot be a member of the subservient "city" councils. These 'city" councils maintain their own community boards and identity. The boundaries of the "supercity" to be a south from Waiwera and north from Drury. Waiheke and Gt barrier to become part of Hauraki/Coromandel District Council.

#2 - Derek Peel 2009-04-25 13:18 - (Reply)

Democracy works best when it is open and transparent. National repeatedly accused Labour of running a Nana State but now, in league with ACT, are doing much worse. National is decising on the manner in which we are governed at Local Level without even asking the people concerned if they want it. A referrendum, even at a million dollars, is a cheap way to lay those accusations to rest and show that National does actual care and listen to those who put them in power.

#3 - Helen Brooks 2009-05-03 09:26 - (Reply)

I strongly think that we as the Auckland public need to be able to elect our own representatives for our city, rather than guaranteeing any ethnic minority representation. The Treaty is irrelevant nowadays - times have changed, Auckland has most certainly changed. Should we also have 2 Indian, 4 East Asian, 2 Polynesian seats guaranteed on this council for our city? No. Let Aucklanders choose to elect who is best for the city. If you don't vote you cannot complain. Having seats for certain races is racist and totally unnecessary in this 21st century. Lets focus on the positives in terms of minising the amount of bureaucrats and council sponges, getting the rates bills down for Aucklanders through efficiency and better productivity for our great city,a nd set a vision for us to become a truly global international leader. Long live Auckland. Helen Brooks


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.