Video

7 Comments
24 February 2010
Video Journal No.22

23 February. John walks through some of the Government's proposed changes to the tax system, with particular emphasis on changes that may be made to GST. He talks about why food cannot be exempted from GST and discusses other fundamental issues of tax fairness as well as the ultimate goal of the Government in making changes to the tax structure and encourages those with concerns about rumoured changes to wait until the Budget is released in May to get a fuller picture of what is taking place - and why.

Social Media


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Kevin Owen said:
2010-02-26 18:42 - (Reply)

Hi John, watched the video. Glad to have you at the helm. Cheers.

#1.1 - John Dixon said:
2010-02-26 19:28 - (Reply)

Removing G S T from taxes such as rates would be a senseable move for a start,and kerb the yearly rise of rates we are burdons with every year. John

#2 - Carl 2010-02-26 19:00 - (Reply)

Love it! Democratic Socialism. I'm all for more tax as long as that money goes back it to the right areas i.e. education and health not into hand-outs.

#3 - Anne 2010-02-26 21:12 - (Reply)

Congratulations John, You are making good progress through difficult times. Your decisions need to remain firm and fair and new Zealanders will support you. We all want the best for our precious country. For NZ to progress from the bottom of the OECD we must raise productivity. That means we must give a little more and take a little less. ie work harder!

#4 - Corie Haddock 2010-02-26 22:26 - (Reply)

Hi John, thanks for all your hard work your government is doing a lot of good things. I'm concerned about the impact the tax reduction will have on the most marginalized people in our community. I work with these people and see the impact the recession is having on them, will the increase in GST benefit the poor or make it more difficult for them to live? How will the increase create jobs and ensure a better live for all new Zealanders? I have seen first hand the benefits you and your government have had on those in need, but there needs to be more done to help them make a better life for themselves and their families. Keep up the hard work, I know it's touch but national is making a difference and I'm behind you 100%...

#5 - phillip smith said:
2010-02-27 16:08 - (Reply)

My concern with this proposal is that a lot of small business have over the last year to 18 months have been struggling to stay afloat. Many have not made anything near a profit for up to two years. Many have been borrowing to pay wages or to pay themselves or have been putting money into their businesses to keep the doors open. So any tax cuts will be pretty much academic as far as they are concerned. They will however get a double whammy affect from any GST increase. They will feel it in their living costs and they will feel it in the reduction in sales due the price hike and the squeeze on margins. Many would have been hoping to increase their prices this year and will this will be negated by the GST rise. I dislike the idea that increases in GST will be made up with increases in welfare payments like working for families. This seems to be a means of making more people welfare dependent, some thing I though national was against. The fundamental problem is low wages in NZ and the idea that lowering taxes can some how equate to raising wages seems a bit of a shell game to me. Every time there is upward pressure on wages the employers scream "Skills shortage" and the open the flood gates trying to bring in low wage alternatives. Companies don't invest in training anymore because as soon as you can you go overseas to earn better money (this is necessary to buy a house in NZ). This opens a positive feed back loop where income and skill levels in NZ decrease as people keep going overseas to earn and are replaced my low income immigrants who will in turn depart for better income as soon as they can.

#5.1 - Mike Corrigan 2010-02-28 01:12 - (Reply)

Many small businesses have struggled over the past 18 months. That fact is that the global financial crisis has affected most people in most countries. Phillip Smith (27/2/10) expresses concerns that “any tax cuts will be pretty much academic” and will not help businesses struggling to recover from the recession. Small businesses may be concerned about a “double whammy” increased costs and “reduced margins”. Margins are not affected by an increase GST as GST does not impact on profitability. Sales may reduce, but history has shown that this is only temporary. It has also shown us that often sales increase prior to the date of the increase, so the net effect is probably evened out. He raises concerns about the ‘Working for Families’ scheme. He is right. It is a poorly constructed mechanism for assisting working families via the tax system. It is just another unnecessary distortion to the direct tax system. A flatter tax system benefits all taxpayers more fairly and doesn’t discriminate against special groups (i.e. working couples with no children). However, any increase in GST will impact on those on fixed incomes (beneficiaries, super annuitants, etc.). The Government recognises this, and that is why adjustments are being made to payments to offset the increases in the cost of goods and services. Smith also rightly points out that NZ has become a low wage economy. This is a key factor impacting on the underperformance of the NZ economy for the past 20 – 30 years. Low wages have been a key driver of Kiwis leaving to live overseas. It is a cliché, but it is true. The only way to increase Kiwis standard of living (i.e. average wage, access of health systems, affordable housing, etc.) is to “grow the economic pie” so we all get a bigger slice. We must create an economy which encourages and rewards enterprise, is internationally competitive, and business friendly, while maintaining our proud traditions of social responsibility. Creativity and business enterprise create wealth – not governments. Governments can only put the necessary structures in place to allow business to thrive and grow, which then benefits the whole economy. A fair, equitable tax system is an integral element of a productive economy. Lower marginal tax rates and a competitive company rate will: - Be and incentive for Kiwi entrepreneurs to operate in NZ, rather than going overseas. - Attract international corporations to operate in NZ, creating increased employment opportunities, and tax revenue. - reduce the necessity for people to arrange their affairs to “avoid” paying high tax rates (e.g. use of trusts, LAQC’s, etc. - be in incentive for “ex-pat” Kiwis to return to NZ. - Allow GST to be utilised as an efficient tax revenue generation system. GST is a non-discriminative tax because it is almost impossible to evade. I think it was David Lange who noted that, “Even drug dealers pay GST”. The proposed changes to the tax system are an integral step in moving the NZ economy to being a modern, efficient and productive economy. Ireland did it successfully in the 1990’s. I believe, with political courage, intelligence and hard work, we can do it too.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.