] National Govt to support UN rights declaration - Rt Hon John Key
News release

6 Comments
20 April 2010
National Govt to support UN rights declaration

Prime Minister John Key announced today the New Zealand Government has given its support to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The decision to support the declaration was conveyed in a speech today by the Minister of Maori Affairs, Dr Pita Sharples, to the United Nations in New York.

"New Zealand has always supported the overall aspirations of the declaration, and we already implement most provisions contained within it," says Mr Key. 

The statement in support of the declaration:

  • acknowledges that Maori hold a special status as tangata whenua, the indigenous people of New Zealand and have an interest in all policy and legislative matters;
  • affirms New Zealand's commitment to the common objectives of the declaration and the Treaty of Waitangi; and
  • reaffirms the legal and constitutional frameworks that underpin New Zealand's legal system, noting that those existing frameworks define the bounds of New Zealand's engagement with the declaration.

"As a Government, we can be proud of the fact that we have worked through any difficulties supporting the declaration have presented," says Mr Key.

"While the declaration is non-binding, it both affirms accepted rights and establishes future aspirations.  My objective is to build better relationships between Maori and the Crown, and I believe that supporting the declaration is a small but significant step in that direction.

 "This move will not compromise the fundamentals of this Government's approach to resolving Treaty claims, and its work with Maori and all New Zealanders on the many challenges we face," says Mr Key.

Questions and Answers

What is the significance of a United Nations declaration?

A Declaration is a statement by the UN General Assembly about matters it considers to be significant. A Declaration is an expression of aspiration.. Unlike a treaty or covenant, a Declaration is not legally binding.

States do not sign up to or ratify a Declaration of the UN General Assembly.  Once a Declaration has been adopted, that is it in the formal sense.  States who subsequently wish to indicate their support for a Declaration may do so, for example, by way of a statement.  The Government has decided to take such an approach in the present case.

What is the nature of the New Zealand support for the Declaration?

In sum, the statement:

  • acknowledges that Māori hold a special status as tangata whenua, the indigenous people of New Zealand and have an interest in all policy and legislative matters;
  • affirms New Zealand's commitment to the common objectives of the Declaration and the Treaty of Waitangi; and
  • reaffirms the legal and constitutional frameworks that underpin New Zealand's legal system, noting that those existing frameworks define the bounds of New Zealand's engagement with the Declaration.

New Zealand has put considerable effort into developing processes that recognise the special status of Māori as tangata whenua (indigenous people), resolving their grievances, and providing for their participation and involvement in governance matters. For example, the Waitangi Tribunal is the key body for considering and making recommendations in respect of grievances of Māori. We have wanted to ensure that our support for the Declaration respects the work carried out by successive governments in New Zealand, and indeed by Māori, in giving practical effect to the Treaty of Waitangi.

What are the implications for Māori of the New Zealand Government's support for the Declaration? 

New Zealand's support for the Declaration is an important step forward in supporting the rights of indigenous peoples around the world. At the very beginning of the negotiations of the Declaration there was widespread support amongst Māori for the Declaration. It reaffirms the existing rights held by Māori as tangata whenua (indigenous people) and impresses upon us all that the partnership between Māori and the government continues to evolve.

The previous Government elected not to support the Declaration, even in qualified terms, so why is the Government supporting the Declaration now?

Successive Governments have considered certain elements of the Declaration, particularly principles advocating prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples in decision-making and full reparation or restitution for wrongfully taken land and resources, to be inconsistent with New Zealand's domestic arrangements and democratic processes.

This Government has reviewed New Zealand's position on the Declaration. The statement of support acknowledges these areas are difficult and challenging but notes the aspirational spirit of the Declaration and affirms to continually progress these, alongside Maori, within the current legal and constitutional frameworks of New Zealand.

Many of the rights in the Declaration have been enjoyed in New Zealand for years. For example the Declaration includes rights of indigenous peoples to:

  • full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms without discrimination (Articles 1 and 2);
  • live in freedom, peace and security as distinct peoples (Article 7);
  • practise and revitalise their cultural traditions and customs (Article 11);
  • practise and teach their spiritual and religious traditions (Article 12);
  • participate in decisions in matters that affect their rights (Article 18);
  • improvement of economic and social conditions without discrimination (Article 21).

Does support for the Declaration change the Treaty settlements process?

The Treaty settlements process and the goal of settling all Treaty claims by 2014, remain in place.

Will Māori get a veto right on government decisions?

The Treaty of Waitangi continues to be the basis for the Crown-Māori relationship.  In some instances this does involve mutual agreement on proposals, notably Treaty claim settlements, but right of veto is not conferred.

What does support mean for the review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act?

The Government has released a public consultation document setting out options for a possible replacement of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004.  The Government will consider submissions and reach a final view once the consultation process has been reported on.  Support for the Declaration has no direct bearing on the review.


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - June Dawrant 2010-04-20 10:19 - (Reply)

Today two lifetine National supporters depart the National Party. We join many of our friends who have already signed off. Carrying forward socialist policies are not what we vote for and had we known of a Maori Party deal before the election, it wold have happened sooner. It is more than money that drives people from NZ.

#2 - Roy Carter 2010-04-20 11:24 - (Reply)

Indigenous people? WHAT indigenous people? All peoples in NZ arrived from someplace else. NZ has NO indigenous people and no amount of politically correct word games will change that fact. Be very careful what you concede to the Maori Party, John. Kiwis WILL lose patience and fight back. The RWC is just around the corner. The eyes of the world will be on NZ. What a perfect opportunity for Kiwis to take to the streets and bring to the world's attention the racially divisive policies that are being implemented here.

#2.1 - Michael Lane 2010-04-21 06:13 - (Reply)

Somehow I doubt that people will be taking to the streets to protest the upholding of justice and honour. It would seem that those who wish to promote forced assimilation and a culturally homogenous society are those that are up in arms with the recent support for the Declaration. Indigenous aspirations for self determination are about retaining our identities, not forcing non-Indigenous to adopt our values and ways of life. If only the inverse were true for people like yourself.

#3 - Clayton Luke 2010-04-22 09:41 - (Reply)

OMG, John Key have you lost your mind? This Declaration of politically correct nonsense is so obviously full of flaws. 1. Article 5 Maori cannot be forcedly assimilated into the New Zealand culture. How does this sit with the Treaty of Waitangi vesting sovereignty? 2. Article 21, the RIGHT to IMPROVEMENT of social and economic positions. So in times of negative growth, Maori have a right to be subsidized by the rest of us so they can always be improving? You can't give a right to a position, you can only give a right to an equal opportunity to a position. Otherwise, you rob people of the incentive to strive. If you want to do real harm to a population, then rob them of their reason to strive and improve. The same can be said for Article 24 The equal RIGHT to enjoyment of the highest standard of physical and mental health. No Government can MAKE people healthy. Governments provide OPPORTUNITIES to be healthy equally and where affordable. This document is unworkable and to say the National Government will aspire to bring it about will prove to be a bigger misstep than the Foreshore and Seabed legislation ever was. OMG save us from the turmoil this is going to bring.

#4 - Phil Harris 2010-04-22 22:10 - (Reply)

I'm appalled this has been signed, there was no mandate to do this at all, I very much doubt even the majority of the National Party would agree with this, why was it done so secretly? I am not against settling Treaty claims, but very against NZ signing this. Until this is repealed I very much doubt I'll be voting National ever again. Something went seriously wrong the decision making process of your government here.

#5 - Hugh C 2010-04-23 17:04 - (Reply)

At what point will the Government accept that the only strong future for NZ is one in which we work and move forward as a unified society? This signing is yet another divisive step, taken on racial grounds. The more we tell Maori that they should be getting special rights and priviledges, the more demands we can expect to see from them. Nothing stimulates greed more than pandering to it, and all of us are subject to that weakness.I will always want more, its human nature. People need to believe that they can work and struggle and succeed based on their own efforts, and not find others are getting a priviledged ride alongside them, as we have now. John, you may feel that this document will have no effect. But it has to have the effect of encouraging the demand for more and more rights, money, and priviledge. It cannot play any role in generating racial harmony in NZ!


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.