Newsletter

18 Comments
20 May 2010
Budget 2010: Building the Recovery

In this issue I talk about our changes to New Zealand's tax structure and what we hope to achieve with tax cuts and other initiatives.

 

Watch my latest video - on Budget 2010
Watch me on YouTube

BUDGET 2010: BUILDING THE RECOVERY

This afternoon Bill English delivered our second Budget. It will build the recovery of our economy, help Kiwi families get ahead, and deliver the brighter future National campaigned on in 2008.

It's great that we've come out of the recession in stronger shape than many countries. Our economy is expected to grow by 3.2 per cent in the coming year.

But we're not out of the woods yet, so this is a sensible Budget that keeps a tight rein on government spending, and returns our books to surplus by 2016.

We're taking a lot of positive steps. By focusing on faster and more sustainable economic growth, the Budget will help create jobs, boost incomes, raise living standards, and provide world-class public services for you and your family.

REFORMING THE TAX SYSTEM

Our tax package is the largest reform of the tax system in nearly 25 years. It helps families get ahead, encourages savings and productive investment, creates a fairer tax system, and keeps skilled Kiwis in New Zealand.

This includes across-the-board tax cuts and a rise in GST to 15 per cent. We're increasing Superannuation, Working For Families, and benefit payments, to compensate for the one-off change to GST. We're also changing the rules for investment property owners.

Calculate your tax cut at www.taxguide.govt.nz

See a one page summary of the Budget here.
See a two page summary of our tax reform here.

BETTER HEALTHCARE, SOONER

We're boosting spending on health by $2.1 billion over four years. This includes providing District Health Boards with more money to improve frontline services for patients. We're also investing more in disability support services and elective surgery - necessary operations such as joint replacements, cataract removal, and ear, nose, and throat surgery. Last year we delivered an extra 12,000 elective operations, which is the largest ever annual increase. Our focus on elective surgery will continue.

See a one page summary of our health initiatives here.

LIFTING EDUCATION STANDARDS

We're boosting spending on education by $1.4 billion over four years. This includes more support for schools, and more money for early childhood education so we can target families in need. We're also investing in vital broadband tools for schools.

See a one page summary of our education initiatives here.

UNCLOGGING THE GROWTH ARTERIES

We're investing $1.45 billion in infrastructure such as broadband, rail, schools and prisons this year. We're tackling bottlenecks in our roading, electricity, and telecommunications networks. And we're providing high-quality and cost-effective infrastructure such as schools and prisons.

See a one page summary of our infrastructure initiatives here.

SUPPORTING FAMILIES

Budget 2010 helps make sure that families in need get better frontline services and support. This includes expanding the Job Ops programme for 16-24 year olds, investing in services for teen parents, and more money for non-governmental organisations to deliver high-quality services. We're also extending our Housing Innovation Fund for another year, and launching a financial assistance package to help homeowners get their leaky homes fixed.

See a one page summary of our social development and housing initiatives here.

INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE

We're investing in New Zealand's future by putting $321 million into new science, research and technology initiatives over four years. Science will help lift the long-term performance of the New Zealand economy. 

See a one page summary of our science initiatives here.

BOOSTING TOURISM

Last week I announced an extra $30 million for tourism this year. Tourism will play an important role in helping us get the economy growing faster. Most of the new money will be used to market New Zealand as a tourist destination internationally.

FROM MY DIARY

Tomorrow I'm speaking at a post-Budget business lunch in Auckland and opening Albany Senior High School's new buildings. On Saturday I'm off to Oamaru for the Mainland National Party Conference.

Best wishes,

John Key
Prime Minister

Click here to read and comment on my newsletters

Click here to follow me on Twitter.

Click here to support me on Facebook.
Click here to check out our  Budget 2010 photos on Flickr.

Click here to read Bill English's Focus on Finance.
Click here to subscribe to newsletters from Ministers.


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Meg Henry 2010-05-21 08:14 - (Reply)

We LOVED your speech in reply to Phil Goff yesterday..never had any doubt that you were the man for the job..that speech confirmed it !

#2 - Barbara Ellis 2010-05-21 10:49 - (Reply)

I fail to see how I will be better off with the new ETS Tax just around the corner. The extra 4c litre tax on fuel, extra power costs and the extra GST will offset any gains.

#2.1 - Alan Fletcher 2010-05-21 20:34 - (Reply)

Why is there no mention at all in the budget of the impact on all taxpayers when the ETS is implemented in 6 weeks time??

#3 - Max Legg said:
2010-05-21 11:01 - (Reply)

You are doing an excellent job John. It's great to have a Prime Minister, and caucus, so passionate for our future as a Nation.I'm excited about the future of New Zealand now, as the decisions you all are making are so life building, and foundational to success. Your sudden return to attend the funeral of the three airmen whom died on ANZAC day speaks louder than words.Thankyou for doing that. .

#4 - Roy Carter 2010-05-21 11:19 - (Reply)

What with the hike in GST and the looming ETS scam, these tax cuts will mean naff all to the average Kiwi. Who do National think they're kidding?

#4.1 - Rik 2010-06-09 01:20 - (Reply)

Yes ETS is nothing but a scam as of course is the UN;I voted for Key thinking he was a genuine guy with common sense, but "NO",after all he is not, just another polly.The Nats will be hurt badly by this ETScam stupidity.

#4.1.1 - David Lloyd 2010-06-10 09:33 - (Reply)

I agree, how anyone thinks that by giving someone or something money we'll suddenly have more or less rain, snow, temp change is beyond belief. Climate controls economics, not the other way around. Key should study his own specialty, world economics. This is apart from the fact there is little to no evidence humans have caused dramatic climate change. Look at the Iceland volcanoes, in 2 weeks discounted any effort humans have made to change climate.

#4.1.1.1 - Bruce Simpson said:
2010-06-11 10:41 - (Reply)

You seem to be under the mistaken belief that the ETS is about protecting the environment. I would argue that it's more about protecting and enhancing a bureaucracy and those who inhabit it. Of course if JK has evidence to the contrary, I'd love to see it. Not holding my breath though.

#5 - Bruce Simpson said:
2010-05-21 12:00 - (Reply)

This was one of the better budgets we've had in recent times and National must be commended for its approach to restoring a fair and reasonable tax system. I particularly like the emphasis on moving investment out of non-productive areas such as property. When people invest their spare income in a rental house, it does nothing to improve NZ's performance and produces no additional revenue for the nation. My only concern with this budget is the "commitment" to R&D -- or the lack thereof. We're constantly told (by everyone except Dr Cullen) that we're a nation of clever and resourceful innovators. The Hamilton Jet Boat is just one example of how a Kiwi in a shed can invent and develop world-class technology that has gone on to earn massive amounts of (taxable) money. As someone who works in this area, I'm aware of a huge number of very clever people working on ideas that are, in some cases, absolutely brilliant -- but for who this budget delivers nothing but disappointment. When I saw that the government was making property investment less attractive I thought "excellent, perhaps there'll now be more private capital available for startup ventures and turning good Kiwi ideas into commercially successful export-earning enterprises" Unfortunately, the government missed this opportunity completely and instead, decided to hand out taxpayers money to those who perhaps need it the least -- the companies that are already successful. I'm not suggesting that we have the silly technology "grants" and handouts that previous governments have used in their practice of "picking winners" (most of which turned out be losers). I'm talking about an adjustment to the tax system to create non-transferable over-unity tax credits for private R&D investment. Such a move would make it much easier for startups to attract the capital that will now be leaving the property market and looking for a home. Even better, such a move would promote the creation of exciting, innovative, potentially very profitable new companies that would turn Kiwi ideas into export revenues. Best of all, those ventures that failed to achieve their goals would represent *no* cost to the taxpayer because their tax-credits would be wiped if/when failed ventures were liquidated. However, those which succeeded and prospered, thanks to the more ready availability of private venture capital, would go on to earn export receipts and pay tax on their profits - a win-win for everyone. Although I have asked many politicians what is wrong with this proposal, none have been able to come up with any objections to it. Is it just too much like commonsense for politicians to understand it? This week's budget scores 7/10 in my book. Some good moves, ankle-tapped by the usual political myopia.

#6 - Kamel Hanna Yacoub. said:
2010-05-21 15:40 - (Reply)

most intelligent national budget. Bill English( vast financial experience ) + John Key(most intelligent business brain )=unique effective budget which aims at motivating every citizen to work hard and enjoy life and gradually reduce budget deficits.

#7 - Gary Westwood 2010-05-22 00:16 - (Reply)

A very positive Budget & one that very obviously put Phil Goff & the Opposition right on the back foot. Oh, how I would loved to have been a fly on the wall at their 'What do we do now' meeting after the delivery of the Budget. I still have a very serious gripe about your handling of ETS & the seeming lack of concern on your part about this very contentious issue. It is an open secret that there is strife within the party at both branch and divisional level about ETS & it is only a matter of time before either the media, a blogster or a recording device-carrying Labour Party supporter puts some embarassing material in front of an increasingly sceptical public. A public who will be extremely fired up once the fuel & energy ETD surcharges are applied. The public still have an element of trust in you - please don't put that at risk with your seemingly blind loyalty to Nick Smith, his lefty views & his deference to the forestry interests in his electorate.

#8 - Kathy 2010-05-22 15:39 - (Reply)

Confused- John Key said no one you be worse off with GST rising then how come the likes of an invalid will get a 2.2% rise. According to the herald (Friday 21st May) the gross payment of benefits will be cut so they do not get the tax cut as well but GST goes up 2.5% this alone is going to leave the most needy worse off and not to mention retailers already talking about extra rises in prices on top of the GST increase. After working and paying taxes for aprox 40 years I am not a bludger and cannot help getting a incurable illness which forced me onto a invalids benefit.

#8.1 - Bruce Simpson said:
2010-05-22 20:57 - (Reply)

Actually I noticed a subtle change of phrase between the pre-budget talk and the post-budget talk. Before the budget was actually released, the phrase was "no-one will be worse off" and now it's "most people will be better off" There's a huge chasm of difference between those two phrases. Since she had a very bad workplace accident last year, my wife has been on income-related earnings compensation from ACC. Will *that* sum be increased to allow for the effect of hiked GST? I suspect not -- in which case we were deceived when we were told "no-one will be worse off". To be honest, I'd like an answer to that question.

#9 - Des Schumacher 2010-05-22 17:10 - (Reply)

Great budget John, I can see where you are heading but I agree with a lot of other comments that ETS has to be revised. If it is going to be inforced, where is that money going to go? As to date nobody has mentioned it. Also, I hope it is just not a form of tax that will go into the general fund because if it is, then John - you will be letting your voters down and it may cost you at next election. Remember what you said during the MP's claims debate - honesty is the best policy. A small comment on the leaky building fiasco, why is BRANZ not being held accountable and the overseas companies that supplied the coating products to the installers. The blame also lies with the installers/suppliers as I am aware that the coatings do need to be reapplied every 3-5 years to maintain the minimum coating thickness. Worth looking in to??

#10 - Alan Nixcholson 2010-05-25 10:09 - (Reply)

Its pretty disappointing that you choose to ignore the impact of the tax clawback that will result from the ETS and I don't blame you for chosing to leave this out of any budget comments. I'd be interested to know how much confidence you have in Nick Smith given his about face on this issue since he was in Opposition. Maybe its time he spent more time back there. I suspect next year will reveal how much damage he has done to National in the electorate.

#11 - Elaine Cradock 2010-06-08 14:58 - (Reply)

Not a budget as it goes, but hardworking kiwis will be hit by the ETS scheme as well. National should have followed Australia's lead and cancel the ETS scheme this year. New Zealand is not a high polution country and we shouldn't be punished for the rest if the high polution countries.

#12 - Brian Batie 2010-06-11 12:20 - (Reply)

Budget disapponting as it did little to reduce overstaffed beaucracy and reduce Government expenditure. Prime Minister you had a madate from your supporters but nothing postive from you.

#13 - Chris 2010-06-13 12:55 - (Reply)

I'm glad something is being done. We haven't had a shake up in a very very long time. It's good to see you have the courage to "change" John. New Zealand hates that


Add Comment

To prove you're not a spambot, just answer this simple question: Who is the Prime Minister of New Zealand?
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.