News release

4 Comments
14 June 2010
Speaking notes from Post Cabinet Press Conference on Foreshore and Seabed

As you all know, this morning I met the Maori Party leadership and Iwi Leaders Group to discuss the foreshore and seabed issue.

The desire to find an alternative to the Foreshore and Seabed legislation Act was an important part of our Confidence and Supply agreement with the Maori Party.  It has been my view as Prime Minister that it's important for the nation to settle these issues so it does not remain as a weeping sore that would have to be addressed at some stage by a future government.

I particularly want to thank the Iwi Leaders Group, and the Maori Party, for the constructive and pragmatic way they have approached these negotiations.  I also want to thank the many thousands of New Zealanders who have been involved in the consultation process over the past few months.

I can report that the National government, the Maori Party, and iwi leaders, have agreed a common position on the foreshore and seabed issue.

Today Cabinet has in agreement with the Maori Party made the following decisions:

- The 2004 Act will be repealed and replaced with new legislation;

- The foreshore and seabed area currently vested in Crown ownership will be replaced by a public space which is incapable of being owned in a fee simple sense;  

       - existing Maori and Pakeha private titles would continue unaffected

       - this is the proposal that to date has been labelled 'public domain'-

         the name may change but the essence of the proposal is the same

- Customary title and customary rights will be recognised through access to justice in a new High Court process or through direct negotiations with the Crown

- To establish customary title, mandated iwi will need to meet a number of tests.  The test for customary rights and for customary title under a replacement regime will be the same as in the consultation document.  The Government is satisfied that the test as articulated in the consultation document reflects the position we think the Courts would have come to if the previous government had not imposed the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004.

            - Public access, and existing navigation and fishing rights will be protected.

Drafting will commence on a bill which we hope to introduce in August.  Over coming weeks we will seek to build support from other political parties.

There will be a select committee process to allow further public submissions, with a view to a replacement Act being put in place by the end of this year. 

Social Media


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - John K Probert said:
2010-06-14 18:18 - (Reply)

Thank you Prime Minister for the work that you have carried out on behalf of all of us who call NZ home. We are fortunate as a nation to have your government in place and you as our national leader. John K Probert AUT University, Auckland.

#2 - Anil Channa 2010-06-14 18:57 - (Reply)

A step in right direction Mr. Key. New Zealand is now a multi cultural society where everyone has equal opportunity to succeed. Our seas & foreshores should be shared by all

#2.1 - Colin Beck said:
2010-06-19 14:01 - (Reply)

Foreshore & Seabed 2004 Act Despite your assertions the overwhelming support is for the current 2004 Act to remain intact. This legislation is fair to all and what is more inportant, working well. My congratulations to the Maori party who with only five M.P's have once again outwitted the National Party.

#3 - Max Legg said:
2010-06-18 09:29 - (Reply)

Hi John ...So grateful for all you have done, and are doing...You would be very aware of the deep concern the major majority of New Zealanders have at present, with the ETS costs that are going to severley hit their pockets next month. To us out here, it seems very, very wrong, to go down that track. I remember when I was a stock and station agent,especially, when there were severe downturns in the market, and farmers were really struggling to meet their committments,suddenly, there would come some day-light, and hope again, yet for them,only to see all the charges like MAF, Killing charges, sprays, fertilizer, and necessary implemnts etc; take a huge leaps in price.The result being, as the market improved, it robbed the Farmer of a much deserved, and needed lift in their income. It reminded me a Solomons proverb; "Though the poor produce abundance of food, injustice sweeps it away"...Over 25+ years of experience in that industry,I saw it become a rolling patten nearly every 7 years. It finally would break many of their hearts, and they would sell or get out of the industry.I recorded 18 farmers from Pukekohe to Whangarei whom committed suicide, in the 1987-89 period.I say that, to say this with respect;I can't grasp the necessity for NZ'ers to invest in the ETS project. It's going to be like a cancer, that will rob the people of prosperity and freedom. The ETS is like another new drug to the addict that will finally kill him off. I beilieve it could derail all the good work you have done thus far if you proceed down this path of the ETS. Please think cleary about it again. Thank you for your leadership. Max


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.